On 26/07/19 22:14, Martin Wynne wrote:
The tag is *barrier*=gate.
A permanently open gate isn't a barrier, so I don't think it should be
tagged as such. At least not across a way.
It is a barrier ready for use.
You could add a separate node to one side of the way, and tag that as
a gate.
26 Jul 2019, 14:14 by mar...@templot.com:
> The tag is *barrier*=gate.
>
> A permanently open gate isn't a barrier, so I don't think it should be tagged
> as such. At least not across a way.
>
Amber there is *highway*=path
and land*use*=water.
And *natural*=water used for man
made water
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 6:38 PM Martin Wynne wrote:
> Sometimes deciding what is and isn't a gate is tricky. Is this a gate?
>
To me that's very clearly a gate 路♂️
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Sometimes deciding what is and isn't a gate is tricky. Is this a gate?
http://85a.uk/beware_bull_960x772.jpg
If not, what is it? Should it be mapped at all?
cheers,
Martin.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On 2019-07-26 15:47, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 26/07/2019 13:28, David Woolley wrote: On 26/07/2019 12:57, Stephen
> Colebourne wrote: unless there is an explicit "private" sign
> There is no legal need for "private" signs. The default assumption should be
> that everything is private
... in
On 26/07/2019 13:28, David Woolley wrote:
On 26/07/2019 12:57, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
unless there is an explicit "private" sign
There is no legal need for "private" signs. The default assumption
should be that everything is private
... in England and Wales. Scotland is somewhat more
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:15 PM Martin Wynne wrote:
> The tag is *barrier*=gate.
>
> A permanently open gate isn't a barrier, so I don't think it should be
> tagged as such. At least not across a way.
>
It's a common mistake to interpret keys to match their corresponding word
definitions. The
On 26/07/2019 12:57, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
unless there is an explicit "private" sign
There is no legal need for "private" signs. The default assumption
should be that everything is private (even though the OSM default is
mainly the opposite).
In my part of the country, garden front
Op vr 26 jul. 2019 om 13:15 schreef Martin Wynne :
>
> The tag is *barrier*=gate.
>
> A permanently open gate isn't a barrier, so I don't think it should be
> tagged as such. At least not across a way.
In OSM tagging, the definition isn't strongly tied to the literal
English meaning, but rather
The tag is *barrier*=gate.
A permanently open gate isn't a barrier, so I don't think it should be
tagged as such. At least not across a way.
You could add a separate node to one side of the way, and tag that as a
gate.
A gate which is often open, but sometimes closed, is just an ordinary
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 11:59, Colin Smale wrote:
> On 2019-07-26 12:26, Gareth L wrote:
> This was discussed on the wiki
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:barrier%3Dgate with the
> suggestion of using a status tag. And was also discussed (9 years ago?!)
>
ephen Colebourne' ; 'talk-gb OSM
List'
*Subject:* Re: [Talk-GB] Gates open/closed by default
If a gate opens automatically I would say it's an access=yes
regardless of how the way is tagged.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:scolebou...@joda.org]
Sent: 26
?!)
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2010-May/thread.html [2]
>>
>> Tagging things as access=private does impact routing a lot, so I'd evaluate
>> that use carefully.
>>
>> Gareth
>>
>> ---------
>
On 2019-07-26 12:26, Gareth L wrote:
> This was discussed on the wiki
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:barrier%3Dgate [1] with the
> suggestion of using a status tag. And was also discussed (9 years ago?!)
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2010-May/thread.html
evaluate that use carefully.
Gareth
*From:* Andy Robinson
*Sent:* Friday, July 26, 2019 10:55:37 AM
*To:* 'Stephen Colebourne' ; 'talk-gb OSM List'
*Subject:* Re: [Talk-GB] Gates open/closed by default
If a gate opens aut
routing a lot, so I’d evaluate
that use carefully.
Gareth
From: Andy Robinson
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 10:55:37 AM
To: 'Stephen Colebourne' ; 'talk-gb OSM List'
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Gates open/closed by default
If a gate opens automatically I would say
On 26/07/2019 10:46, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
I'd like to distinguish between two kinds of gate on private roads:
- those where the gate is closed by default (eg automatic closing)
- those where the gate is open by default (the gate exists, but is
rarely if ever closed)
I'd suggest
If a gate opens automatically I would say it's an access=yes regardless of how
the way is tagged.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:scolebou...@joda.org]
Sent: 26 July 2019 10:47
To: talk-gb OSM List
Subject: [Talk-GB] Gates open/closed by default
I'd
I'd like to distinguish between two kinds of gate on private roads:
- those where the gate is closed by default (eg automatic closing)
- those where the gate is open by default (the gate exists, but is
rarely if ever closed)
Currently I'm marking both as barrier=gate & access=private, but I
19 matches
Mail list logo
