Re: [Talk-GB] ITO's OSM Analysis updated with the latest OS Locator data

2013-05-19 Thread Shaun McDonald
Adding not:name is the correct method to resolve these errors and remove them from the list, as they are otherwise tagged correctly in OSM with the name and ref detailed separately. Shaun On 18 May 2013, at 10:51, Donald Noble drno...@gmail.com wrote: I notice that in Glasgow there are 9

Re: [Talk-GB] ITO's OSM Analysis updated with the latest OS Locator data

2013-05-18 Thread Donald Noble
I notice that in Glasgow there are 9 road segments flagged up for name=London Road (A74) which is correctly in OSM as name=London Road ref=A74. I can add not:name to suppress these, but not sure if this is something that is being flagged up elsewhere in country, and if this is something that

[Talk-GB] ITO's OSM Analysis updated with the latest OS Locator data

2013-05-17 Thread Shaun McDonald
Hi, The ITO OSM Analysis comparison between OSM and OS Locator has been updated with the latest OS Locator data released this month. http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main There has been a small dip in the completeness with a noticeable drop in the number at 100%. There hasn't

Re: [Talk-GB] ITO's OSM Analysis updated with the latest OS Locator data

2013-05-17 Thread Derick Rethans
On Fri, 17 May 2013, Shaun McDonald wrote: The ITO OSM Analysis comparison between OSM and OS Locator has been updated with the latest OS Locator data released this month. http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/main There has been a small dip in the completeness with a