On 09/03/11 13:33, Michael Collinson wrote:
Certainly both Chris' and Phillip's cautions are certainly true but
I've paid particular attention to the River Wharfe mid-reaches, which
I know very well and flows in a well-defined channel with high banks
and has not shifted markedly in the last 40
ter Miller
>Cc: Talk GB
>Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Incorrect use of OS VectorMap District when mapping?
>
>On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
>> On reflection possibly we should use river-bank as that has more
>> information in it, but recommend that anyone import
Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Henry Gomersall [mailto:h...@cantab.net] wrote:
>>>> >Sent: 10 February 2011 11:07 AM
>>>> >To: Peter Miller
>>>> >Cc: Talk GB
>>>> >Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Incorrect use of
ncorrect use of OS VectorMap District
when mapping?
>
>On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
>> On reflection possibly we should use river-bank as that has more
>> information in it, but recommend that anyone importing does a 'bridge
>> cleanup&
On 09/03/2011 11:57, Michael Collinson wrote:
At 12:32 10/02/2011, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Henry Gomersall [mailto:h...@cantab.net] wrote:
>Sent: 10 February 2011 11:07 AM
>To: Peter Miller
>Cc: Talk GB
>Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Incorrect use of OS VectorMap District w
On 09/03/11 11:57, Michael Collinson wrote:
At 12:32 10/02/2011, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Henry Gomersall [mailto:h...@cantab.net] wrote:
>Sent: 10 February 2011 11:07 AM
>To: Peter Miller
>Cc: Talk GB
>Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Incorrect use of OS VectorMap District w
0 7430 4474
F
E phillip.barn...@itn.co.uk
WWW.ITN.CO.UK
Please consider the environment. Do you really need to print this email?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Collinson [mailto:m...@ayeltd.biz]
Sent: 09 March 2011 11:57
To: 'Talk GB'
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Incorrect use of OS VectorMap D
At 12:32 10/02/2011, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Henry Gomersall [mailto:h...@cantab.net] wrote:
>Sent: 10 February 2011 11:07 AM
>To: Peter Miller
>Cc: Talk GB
>Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Incorrect use of OS VectorMap District when mapping?
>
>On Thu, 2011-02-10 at
W.H. Gomersall [mailto:wh...@hermes.cam.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Henry wrote:
>Gomersall
>Sent: 10 February 2011 1:38 PM
>To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
>Cc: 'Peter Miller'; 'Talk GB'
>Subject: RE: [Talk-GB] Incorrect use of OS VectorMap District when mapping?
&
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 11:32 +, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
wrote:
> >On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
> >> On reflection possibly we should use river-bank as that has more
> >> information in it, but recommend that anyone importing does a
> 'bridge
> >> cleanup' at th
On 09/02/2011 20:27, Kevin Peat wrote:
Hi Jason,
I am the mapper (user:devonshire) who imported the woods in your first
example around Dartmouth but it was last May so not exactly recently.
The woods that are there now are a lot better than the NPE traced ones
that we had before. I took the v
Henry Gomersall [mailto:h...@cantab.net] wrote:
>Sent: 10 February 2011 11:07 AM
>To: Peter Miller
>Cc: Talk GB
>Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Incorrect use of OS VectorMap District when mapping?
>
>On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
>> On reflection possibly
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
> On reflection possibly we should use river-bank as that has more
> information in it, but recommend that anyone importing does a 'bridge
> cleanup' at the same time.
This is an area I'm actually really interested in (for rural rivers) and
ke
On 10/02/2011 10:30, Peter Miller wrote:
Personally I would prefer a single linear way for streams rather than
the area 'river-bank' approach which the OS use...
Ideally it should be mapped with both:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank
Cheers
Dave F.
__
Hi,
On 02/10/11 11:35, Henry Gomersall wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
Personally I would prefer a single linear way for streams rather than
the area 'river-bank' approach which the OS use
The 'river-bank' approach has been exceptionally useful to me at times
whe
Peter Miller wrote:
> however the most important thing is for water features to be
> continuous under bridges
Absolutely. Otherwise some of OSM's resident under-bridge-dwellers might be
misled into thinking there was no water, fall in and drown. And we wouldn't
want that!
cheers
Richard
--
Vi
On 10 February 2011 10:35, Henry Gomersall wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
> > Personally I would prefer a single linear way for streams rather than
> > the area 'river-bank' approach which the OS use
>
> The 'river-bank' approach has been exceptionally useful to m
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
> Personally I would prefer a single linear way for streams rather than
> the area 'river-bank' approach which the OS use
The 'river-bank' approach has been exceptionally useful to me at times
when trying to micro-navigate. Why would it ever b
On 9 February 2011 18:42, Jason Cunningham wrote:
> OS VectorMap District is an excellent source of data for features like
> streams and woodland, but these layers of data tend to be a bit of a mess
> and need to be stitched together as part of a method in importing into OSM.
> eg Streams will en
Hi Jason,
I am the mapper (user:devonshire) who imported the woods in your first
example around Dartmouth but it was last May so not exactly recently. The
woods that are there now are a lot better than the NPE traced ones that we
had before. I took the view at the time that importing the VectorMap
OS VectorMap District is an excellent source of data for features like
streams and woodland, but these layers of data tend to be a bit of a mess
and need to be stitched together as part of a method in importing into OSM.
eg Streams will end when they meet a bridge, then reappear the other side of
t
21 matches
Mail list logo
