On 22/03/19 02:35, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote:
Thanks to all for the helpful responses.
I have looked (again) at the OSM Tags for Routing at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#United_Kingdom
from which it is clear that foot=yes (for example) is
Thanks to all for the helpful responses.
I have looked (again) at the OSM Tags for Routing at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#United_Kingdomfrom
which it is clear that foot=yes (for example) is implied by highway=cycleway.
However, Andy's question (if
On 21/03/2019 13:35, Ed Loach wrote:
How tagging changes over time...
RichardF wrote:
highway=cycleway, segregated=no achieves all that in two tags
rather than
seven. :)
I remember
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Milton_Keynes_Mapping_Party_2009
where it looks like we (or at least I) only
How tagging changes over time...
RichardF wrote:
> highway=cycleway, segregated=no achieves all that in two tags
> rather than
> seven. :)
I remember
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Milton_Keynes_Mapping_Party_2009
where it looks like we (or at least I) only used highway=cycleway, e.g.
Peter Neale wrote:
>So how should they be tagged for access? I believe it should be:
> highway=path (but I see several tagged as highway=cycleway and both are
> shown in the Wiki
> at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway)
> foot=designated
> motor vehicle=permit (to allow the
On 21/03/19 04:58, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote:
I am relatively new to OSM, but am trying to contribute in a useful
way, particularly in my local area (Milton Keynes).
Milton Keynes enjoys (among many benefits) an extensive network of
joint-use Cycle Paths / Foot Paths, known as “Redways”
I am relatively new to OSM, but am trying to contribute in a useful way,
particularly in my local area (Milton Keynes).
Milton Keynes enjoys (among many benefits) an extensive network of joint-use
Cycle Paths / Foot Paths, known as “Redways”
7 matches
Mail list logo
