Re: [Talk-GB] Named street shown as missing on ITO OSM analysis

2013-03-29 Thread Donald Noble
Thanks - It should indeed be name = Columbia Terrace I knew I had done something stupid, but couldn't see it for looking! It is only really a parking area, hence why I tagged it as service rather than residential On 29 March 2013 11:29, Philip Barnes wrote: > Should it be name = Columbia Terr

Re: [Talk-GB] Named street shown as missing on ITO OSM analysis

2013-03-29 Thread Philip Barnes
Should it be name = Columbia Terrace. The service tag is used for the type of service road, i.e. driveway. Am wondering if highway = residential, motor_vehicle = private would be better? Phil (trigpoint) -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 29/03/2013 10:36 Donald Noble wrote: Hullo all, Wonderin

Re: [Talk-GB] Named street shown as missing on ITO OSM analysis

2013-03-29 Thread Kevin Peat
Donald, On 29 March 2013 10:36, Donald Noble wrote: > Hullo all, > > Wondering if anyone can shed any light on this. I added a street/name > following a survey a couple of weeks ago, but it is still showing as missing > on the ITO OSM analysis map. > Should be "name = Columba Terrace" not "servi

[Talk-GB] Named street shown as missing on ITO OSM analysis

2013-03-29 Thread Donald Noble
Hullo all, Wondering if anyone can shed any light on this. I added a street/name following a survey a couple of weeks ago, but it is still showing as missing on the ITO OSM analysis map. See: http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/map_browser?bbox=276130,800720,276384,800951&referrer=a