Hi Nick,
Thats awesome - thank you :-)
Best,
Adam
On 26 Jan 2013, at 15:30, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
OK should have both Oxfordshire and Bucks now. (discovered the latter was
also on geofabrik)
It may take some time to render first time you try somewhere out, as it's got
to generate
OK should have both Oxfordshire and Bucks now. (discovered the latter was also
on geofabrik)
It may take some time to render first time you try somewhere out, as it's got
to generate the geojson from the database... but the geojson is now cached
making it much faster on subsequent requests.
Sorry - to follow that up, contours aren't available for the whole of the area.
I'll try and sort this out but might be some time as I don't have the files to
hand.
Nick
-Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote: -
To: Adam Hoyle adam.li...@dotankstudios.com
From: Nick
Hi Barry,
On 24 Jan 2013 11:38, Barry Cornelius barrycorneliu...@gmail.com wrote:
Please can you confirm that the routes are now better...
The Devon kml data looks spot on now.
thanks,
Kevin
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On 24 Jan 2013, at 14:34, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Not entirely tangential question - Is there any chance that the designation
tag will be rendered in the default mapnik anytime soon / ever? Or is there
somewhere that already exists that renders designations?
Yes - www.free-map.org.uk. (at
Not entirely tangential question - Is there any chance that the designation
tag will be rendered in the default mapnik anytime soon / ever? Or is
there somewhere that already exists that renders designations?
Yes - www.free-map.org.uk. (at least for southern and northern England and
Wales)
On 25 Jan 2013, at 10:42, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Not entirely tangential question - Is there any chance that the
designation tag will be rendered in the default mapnik anytime soon /
ever? Or is there somewhere that already exists that renders
designations?
Yes - www.free-map.org.uk.
On 23 Jan 2013 23:22, Barry Cornelius barrycorneliu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Kevin Peat wrote:
The Converted kml file for Devon on this page:
http://www.rowmaps.com/kmls/DN/
Great, thanks. Each path has a name, e.g.:
DN Seaton Footpath 2
It would help if you gave the
On 23 January 2013 19:38, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
No extra designation tag is needed in my opinion. If they are on the
authorities list of streets, then they are legally exactly the same as any
other road. Therefore highway=unclassified would be fine. The issue arises
On 24 January 2013 09:09, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
highway=track, access=yes, designation=unclassified_highway
...makes sense to me for those I have seen. These tracks have no
signage at all but clearly there are public access rights which would
be nice
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Kevin Peat wrote:
If you look at DN Dartmouth Bridleway 1 with the OS map background you can
see it is offset a little to the south.
Following some e-mail exchanges with Devon County Council, on 23rd
December I corrected a few errors in the metadata of a few routes.
On 24 Jan 2013, at 09:09, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
This way of doing the tagging is consistent with what is commonly
already done with Public Rights of Way. The highway=* tag records the
physical appearance of the way (footway, track, road, etc.), the
designation=* tag gives the
Not entirely tangential question - Is there any chance that the designation
tag will be rendered in the default mapnik anytime soon / ever? Or is there
somewhere that already exists that renders designations?
Yes - www.free-map.org.uk. (at least for southern and northern England and
Wales)
On 24 January 2013 14:28, Adam Hoyle adam.li...@dotankstudios.com wrote:
Not entirely tangential question - Is there any chance that the designation
tag will be rendered in the default mapnik anytime soon / ever? Or is there
somewhere that already exists that renders designations?
Since the
On 24 Jan 2013 11:38, Barry Cornelius barrycorneliu...@gmail.com wrote:
Please can you confirm that the routes are now better...
Thanks for that. I'll check it out and let you know (will probably be
tomorrow now).
Kevin
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 24 Jan 2013 15:02, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
Since the public rights of way tagging using designation=* is a very
British (actually English and Welsh) thing, I doubt it will ever be
rendered on the main OSM map. :-(
I don't really see why that
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Barry,
Local government regions in England can be very confusing. For public rights
of way the responsibility of legally collating these on the Definitive Map
and Statement lies with those regions that are “surveying authorities”. This
is the same as the
In regards to Other roads with public access (ORPA) - this is a term that
the Ordnance Survey have used, in other places they are called
Unclassified County Road. Most often they are legally the same as a
normal road (and should therefore appear in the Local Authorities list if
streets, in which
On 23 Jan 2013 18:58, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Thanks for that. Any thoughts on whether they should be specifically tagged
in OSM?
Kevin
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
No extra designation tag is needed in my opinion. If they are on the
authorities list of streets, then they are legally exactly the same as any
other road. Therefore highway=unclassified would be fine. The issue arises
when they are not well maintained, narrow, or not suitable for some larger
On 23 Jan 2013 19:38, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote
Ideas welcome (I've not seen enough examples to get an understanding of
what these roads are actually like on the ground - photos ...
This is one:
http://m.google.co.uk/u/m/R9HAqI
The ones I have surveyed are glorified farm
I'm not sure if anyone will be able to help bring some degree of firmness
to this, but it is my belief that roads that are on the Local Authority
list of streets appear with a solid border in OS StreetView map. So for
your example:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Kevin Peat wrote:
I also noticed that the Devon data (using the kml from your site in josm)
appears to be consistently offset a few metres south of where it should be.
Not a big deal just FYI really.
Which kml file are you referring to?
Please give me a URL so that I can
On 23 Jan 2013 21:42, Barry Cornelius barrycorneliu...@gmail.com wrote:
Which kml file are you referring to?
Please give me a URL so that I can download the kml and check...
The Converted kml file for Devon on this page:
http://www.rowmaps.com/kmls/DN/
Kevin
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Kevin Peat wrote:
The Converted kml file for Devon on this page:
http://www.rowmaps.com/kmls/DN/
Great, thanks. Each path has a name, e.g.:
DN Seaton Footpath 2
It would help if you gave the names of some of the paths you have problems
with. Sorry, I should have
Barry,
Local government regions in England can be very confusing. For public
rights of way the responsibility of legally collating these on the
Definitive Map and Statement lies with those regions that are “surveying
authorities”. This is the same as the 152 (151 if you exclude the “City of
26 matches
Mail list logo