On 12 May 2017 at 12:08, Adam Snape wrote:
> I would be interested to add rights of way information closer to home
> (Lancashire).
I'm currently figuring out how best to make my tool at
http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/progress/ scale to be able to
include many more
It's interesting to compare their approach with that of the capital of what
used to be one of the most closed countries: the Municipality of Tirana
(Albania) is now putting (some of) its data online voluntarily, in
co-operation with the local hackerspace.
http://opendata.tirana.al/
They haven't
On 11 May 2017 at 20:24, John Aldridge wrote:
> One bit of feedback, from a first try at doing this for real: footpaths
> often cross parish boundaries, and at least in this area change their
> reference when they do so. But your slippy map only displays geometry for a
> single
I would be interested to add rights of way information closer to home
(Lancashire).
Dave refers to the long list of other councils that have released row
information. Is this the rowmaps website or is it somewhere on osm that I'm
missing?
The information on rowmaps is not clear. Is all of the
One bit of feedback, from a first try at doing this for real: footpaths
often cross parish boundaries, and at least in this area change their
reference when they do so. But your slippy map only displays geometry
for a single parish at a time, meaning that tracking the prow_ref value
for the
On 11 May 2017 at 08:04, John Aldridge wrote:
> On 11-May-17 00:20, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
>> The presence of prow_ref=*
>> tags to allow matching with official data is almost non-existent.)
>
> So what's the best way to fix this?
>
> If I click on your map, it shows
On 11 May 2017 at 09:07, Dan S wrote:
> Congratulations Robert! The long thread of letters is... educational!
To put it mildly! Well done Robert, not only on the outcome but also
in keeping calm and civil during the protracted correspondence.
My highlight of the saga
On 11-May-17 00:20, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
The presence of prow_ref=*
tags to allow matching with official data is almost non-existent.)
So what's the best way to fix this?
If I click on your map, it shows me something like
Teversham FP 3
(MS: 0 | ΔL/L: —)
which is a bit
After a rather long battle with Cambridgeshire County Council over the
release and licensing of their Public Rights of Way GIS data, the ICO
ruled in my favour again last month, and the Council have now released
the data under the Open Government Licence. This means it's suitable
for use in OSM.
9 matches
Mail list logo