On 03/09/2017 16:17, Andy Moore wrote:
I'm not sure it's the same mapper as before but the end result is the same with
massive areas mis-mapped and tagged, inaccurately even by the mapper's own
admissions with all the FIXME tags.
The thing that suggests to me that it's the same mapper is that
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 10:08:17AM +0100, Andy Townsend wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Back in February there was a discussion here about problems by large heath
> areas added by a "new" user -
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-February/019895.html
> .
>
> The same problem is ha
Hi all
I'm not sure it's the same mapper as before but the end result is the same with
massive areas mis-mapped and tagged, inaccurately even by the mapper's own
admissions with all the FIXME tags. Can't these changesets just be reverted as
the data is junk?
Best regards,
Andy.
(Dyserth)
> O
Hi everyone,
Back in February there was a discussion here about problems by large
heath areas added by a "new" user -
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-February/019895.html
.
The same problem is happening again. It's a different user account, but
their mapping and the
4 matches
Mail list logo