On 24/09/2018 09:34, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
[Side question, albeit not totally off-topic]
Out of curiosity, I understand what a C road is, conceptually, but what
might an “MC” designation mean? E.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426675505
It's a local designation for what are more
The same thing, by the looks of it:
https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=Buckinghamshire_Council#Classified_Unnumbered_.28Class_III.29_and_Unclassified_Roads
Steve
On 24/09/2018 09:34, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
[Side question, albeit not totally off-topic]
Out of curiosity, I
[Side question, albeit not totally off-topic]
Out of curiosity, I understand what a C road is, conceptually, but what might
an “MC” designation mean? E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426675505
Regards,
Stuart
On 24 Sep 2018, at 09:30, Paul Berry
mailto:pmberry2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I would have thought lists like this should be on the Wiki, even if they
don't make it to the map.
Regards,
*Paul*
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 at 21:34, Neil Matthews wrote:
> > If there are tertiary ways that don't meet the above criteria they
> > should be listed in some form of text file for
> If there are tertiary ways that don't meet the above criteria they
> should be listed in some form of text file for individual editing if
> appropriate.
Where does this text file live? Better to add notes to the map / fixmes
to the data.
Neil
___
I don't know where the discussion got to, but thought I should point out
that at least one road in North Yorkshire is a C road that is signposted as
such.
The road here does have signs with the C designation.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/54.5696/-1.0016
I don't think I added it so at least
On 04/05/2015 08:35, Graham Jones wrote:
I don't know where the discussion got to, but thought I should point
out that at least one road in North Yorkshire is a C road that is
signposted as such.
The road here does have signs with the C designation.
On 04/05/15 02:18, Dave F. wrote:
Hi
I seem to remember there was general consensus that C class roads
shouldn't have their reference number in the ref tag as they aren't
really for public use, such as on signs or maps, but the official use
of local councils etc.
It was suggested,
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 08:35 +0100, Graham Jones wrote:
I don't know where the discussion got to, but thought I should point
out that at least one road in North Yorkshire is a C road that is
signposted as such.
The road here does have signs with the C designation.
I once saw some friends on Facebook discussing the state of a road local
to them in Dorset, and they referred to it by its C number throughout.
Personally, I quite like the fact that our map has C numbers on where
other maps don't. What I don't like, though, is seeing U numbers for
On 04/05/2015 10:50, Philip Barnes wrote:
In this case if you have surveyed it and it is signed then it would be
helpful if it was tagged as signed=yes, or something similar.
SomeoneElse I think he has used similar tagging for unsigned A roads.
FWIW I've used name:signed=no and ref:signed=no
On 04/05/2015 11:10, Steve Doerr wrote:
Personally, I quite like the fact that our map has C numbers on where
other maps don't. What I don't like, though, is seeing U numbers for
unclassified roads, which are cluttering up the map of my home area
Well, the C refs are are cluttering up the map of my home area (
others, by the sound of it). I recently used a screen grab of the area
in my OP. I got more replies about the displaying of the C refs than
what I was actually trying to describe - It just confused people.
It's not removing the
On 04/05/2015 10:50, Philip Barnes wrote:
I did do a test edit on changing ref=C/D/U to official_ref, however I
reverted it after some problems mostly with path number continuing onto
roads (which never happens)
There needs to be adequate verifying which is why it should be done by
someone
Hi
I seem to remember there was general consensus that C class roads
shouldn't have their reference number in the ref tag as they aren't
really for public use, such as on signs or maps, but the official use of
local councils etc.
It was suggested, therefore, to swap them to a tag like
15 matches
Mail list logo
