On 5 Jul 2010, at 09:31, Tim Morley wrote:
> I need to report a bug to CloudMade in their pedestrian route finder, I
> think. I shall do it now.
For reference:
http://developers.cloudmade.com/issues/show/658
Tim
___
Talk-gb-midanglia mailing list
On 5 Jul 2010, at 09:16, Barnett, Phillip wrote:
> It is actually tagged access=no, foot=yes, bicycle=yes, which is as it should
> be, (I know this street) and has been since March (previously it was tagged
> bicycle=true, which should be Boolean equivalent anyway)
Thanks for that Phillip. That
On 05/07/2010 09:03, Ed Loach wrote:
According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access the meaning
of access=no is "Access by this transport mode is not permitted,
public does not have a right of way" but it's not clear to me
*which*
mode of transport that sentence refers to.
So, does
On 5 Jul 2010, at 09:03, Ed Loach wrote:
> Reading further down the wiki page, access= is a general term which
> includes foot as a sub-level of the hierarchy. The road should
> probably be tagged access=no, foot=yes (assuming that is the case).
> In this case I'd say Cloudmade's route planner is
Of Ed Loach
Sent: 05 July 2010 09:03
To: 'Tim Morley'; Talk-gb-midanglia@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-gb-midanglia] Sidney Street, Cambridge: access=no - why?
> According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access the meaning
> of access=no is "Access by this trans
> According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access the meaning
> of access=no is "Access by this transport mode is not permitted,
> public does not have a right of way" but it's not clear to me
*which*
> mode of transport that sentence refers to.
>
> So, does "access=no" mean "no vehicula
It looks rather like that's a typo for "node" to me
Tristan Scott BSc(Hons)
Yare Valley Technical Services
07837 205829
01603 858441
On 4 July 2010 23:08, Tim Morley wrote:
> Hi all.
> I've noticed this odd behaviour in CloudMade's walking route planner:
> http://bit.ly/armS4y
> It appears
Hi all.
I've noticed this odd behaviour in CloudMade's walking route planner:
http://bit.ly/armS4y
It appears that even for pedestrians, parts of Sidney Street are treated as
inaccessible, and the answer *might* be the access=no tag that certain parts of
the street have, but I don't know enough
