-- Original Message --
From: "Mike Evans"
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Cc: "David Groom"
Sent: 28/08/2018 19:22:16
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 11:09:47 +
"David Groom" wrote:
There is no consensus.
Personally I'm not in favour of
... oops, forgot to mention the app is Android only, not iOS - and only
supports API 23+ (Marshmallow upwards).
There is now a rough guide, based on yesterday's email, available on the
MapThePaths site. Apologies for the lack of detail on this: I am going away and
have little time at the
I thought that you said c roads would remain in NI but judging by Clive's
reaction I thought something must have changed. He's obviously not
convinced that c roads are going to remain in NI so perhaps you should
make it even more abundantly and explicitly clear that this is the case and
have it
Thanks for your polite request Richard. I stand by my assessment, based not
on your intentions or character but based on the result. Regards Brian
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 at 21:40, Richard Fairhurst
wrote:
> Brian Prangle wrote:
> > I suggest at the very least that the change is reverted for NI.
>
Hi David
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:09:58 +
"David Groom" wrote:
> >>There is no consensus.
> >>
> >>Personally I'm not in favour of the view that any body of water which
> >>is
> >>tidal should be bounded by a way tagged as coastline.
> >>
> >>Reasons for this
> >>
> >>1) Ask any one who
Hi
Hmm.. strange. Note Cycle Map does still render
Check here:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/compare/v4.10.0...v4.13.0
Raise a query here:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues
Cheers
DaveF
On 28/08/2018 18:48, jc...@mail.com wrote:
Has there been a
Even in these days of Brexit, I don't think there's any movement for
Northern Ireland to leave GB. You've been misinformed!
Hi Toby,
Northern Ireland is part of the UK but it's not part of GB.
GB is England, Scotland and Wales.
The official title of this country is "The United Kingdom of
On 29/08/18 20:25, Toby Speight wrote:
Thanks for that - it predates my joining this list. It seems to (partially)
answer only my first question - it's to benefit those who don't like their
rendering (on paper/screen or on a navigation device). That's why we have
rendering rules - if you don't
0> In article <6591308.YUxS5xHkjF@solus>,
0> WebMaster@Killyfole org uk mailto:webmas...@killyfole.org.uk> ("Wou")
wrote:
Wou> ... GB doesn't include Northern Ireland, ...
Even in these days of Brexit, I don't think there's any movement for
Northern Ireland to leave GB. You've been
On 29/08/2018 20:25, Toby Speight wrote:
Thanks for that - it predates my joining this list. It seems to (partially)
answer only my first question - it's to benefit those who don't like their
rendering (on paper/screen or on a navigation device). That's why we have
rendering rules - if you
0> In article
,
0> Dan S. mailto:danstowell%2b...@gmail.com> ("Dan") wrote:
Dan> The documentation happened after-the-fact rather than in advance,
Dan> as the AECoC demands.
There's still no documentation on the tag wiki at [1] or [2].
Interestingly, there is a mention of "unsigned_ref" [3]
Hi Everyone,
Our Open Maps team (https://github.com/microsoft/open-maps) has been taking a
closer look at OSM in the UK. Some of you may have seen my session in Milan
where we talked about Microsoft’s ongoing OSM work in Australia.
We found a few examples of roads missing names that we
0> In article ,
0> Dave F. mailto:davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> ("Dave") wrote:
Dave> Point about OSM wiki: IMO giving multiple options for the same
Dave> entity leads to confusion & errors so should be avoided.
That's exactly what's problematic about "highways_authority_ref": it
creates a tag
On 29/08/18 21:21, Jubal Harpster wrote:
Rosneath Castle Caravan Park
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92291906
_https://goo.gl/maps/5zn1EEXwYER2_
_https://binged.it/2BCrYOr_
OSM has the name on the actual caravan park, which sounds more likely:
On 29/08/18 21:21, Jubal Harpster wrote:
Stadium Mews
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260127900
https://goo.gl/maps/JJNxamCgLy12
_https://binged.it/2C0LAw1_
PAF file ... N5 1FP
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - https://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
On 29/08/2018 20:44, Toby Speight wrote:
0> In article ,
0> Dave F. mailto:davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> ("Dave") wrote:
Dave> Point about OSM wiki: IMO giving multiple options for the same
Dave> entity leads to confusion & errors so should be avoided.
That's exactly what's problematic about
On 29/08/2018 20:35, Toby Speight wrote:
Wou> ... GB doesn't include Northern Ireland, ...
Even in these days of Brexit, I don't think there's any movement for
Northern Ireland to leave GB. You've been misinformed!
Sorry Toby, but it's you who's been misinformed.
On 29/08/2018 20:32, Toby Speight wrote:
I consider it a "niche" that wants them hidden.
The vast, vast majority are hidden on the ground.
I don't see
that we have to mis-tag them all to have them hidden - I can see it
would be useful to have a map with less clutter, but it shouldn't be
0> In article
,
0> Andrew Hain mailto:andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk> ("Andrew") wrote:
Andrew> Toby, I really think you need to read through the conversation
Andrew> archived at
Andrew>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-August/thread.html
Andrew> and answer the points
0> In article <1535456684095-0.p...@n8.nabble.com>,
0> Richard Fairhurst mailto:rich...@systemed.net> ("Richard") wrote:
Richard> Toby Speight wrote:
>> Who is responsible for coordinating the related changes to software -
>> editors, renderers, converters and QA tools - that are required? I
>>
Toby Speight wrote:
> That's why we have
> rendering rules - if you don't like the rendering, change the rules.
What you're suggesting would imply that every worldwide site using OSM data
to display a consumer-facing map, or provide routing, needs to write a
special exception for Great Britain.
21 matches
Mail list logo
