> I've been looking at IoM, Jersey, and Guernsey which AFAIK have no coverage in the Community Index. As you say, it uses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1_alpha-2 country codes via the countryCoder so I'm expanding coverage to ["gb", "gg", "je", "im"]. I believe that there may be an issue
Great...then as far as Northern Ireland is concerned then I think that the
Community Index has it right already. It allows for the overlap or OSMUK
and OSMIE, Talk-GB and Talk-IE
I've been looking at IoM, Jersey, and Guernsey which AFAIK have no coverage
in the Community Index. As you say, it
On 07/02/2020 10:55, Jez Nicholson wrote:
Personally, I interpret the coverage of Talk-GB and OSMUK to be the
same, i.e. Northern Ireland is officially under OSMUK, but for
practical reasons mappers may want to interact with OSMIEand the
same for Talk-GBÂ + Talk-IE.
I think that part of
Personally, I interpret the coverage of Talk-GB and OSMUK to be the same,
i.e. Northern Ireland is officially under OSMUK, but for practical reasons
mappers may want to interact with OSMIEand the same for Talk-GB +
Talk-IE.
This could make the situation of gb geojson simpler. Do you know
4 matches
Mail list logo
