[OSM-talk-ie] Tagging of LEAs that changed in 2019

2020-09-13 Thread Colm Moore
Mead Message: 3 Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:42:44 +0100 From: Colm Donoghue To: Discussion of OpenStreetMap in Ireland Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Tagging of LEAs that changed in 2019 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" The map

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Tagging of LEAs that changed in 2019

2020-09-13 Thread Brian Hollinshead
As mapper of these and nearby parts I find that Colm Donoghues question raises more issues than the one he lists. My prime source for the townlands was the GSGS3906 overlay in JOSM and at the time I had access to the 1901 Census index of townlands. The Boundary commission map. I notice that while

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Tagging of LEAs that changed in 2019

2020-09-12 Thread Colm Donoghue
The map of Holmpatrick LE district is different on https://www.townlands.ie/holmpatrick/ than the map on http://www.boundarycommittee.ie/Maps/Fingal%20LEA%20Report%20Map%202018.pdf The skerries arent included on the boundary commission map, but are on townlands/osm Which is correct? Colm Ar Sat

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Tagging of LEAs that changed in 2019

2020-09-12 Thread Colm Moore
Hi, I think Brian's approach is reasonable. I would make sure they are tagged with dates, even so far as adding the date to the name. Colm --- Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Tagging of LEAs that changed in 2019

2020-09-11 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
Is it a former administrative boundary? I would comply delete it if it no longer administrative boundary. 11 Sep 2020, 13:27 by br...@hollinshead.net: > Under Si 615 of 2018 many of the LEAs in Dublin were altered. After > creating the new ones, I added historic=yes and end dates to the ones tha

[OSM-talk-ie] Tagging of LEAs that changed in 2019

2020-09-11 Thread Brian Hollinshead
Under Si 615 of 2018 many of the LEAs in Dublin were altered. After creating the new ones, I added historic=yes and end dates to the ones that were changed and left boundary=political as the category. see openstreetmap.org/relation/4655804. Please is this the preferred method at large, and if not w