Re: [Talk-in] Indian Districts

>From what I remember, when Harshad imported the districts many years back there was a problem with multipart districts. This caused quite a few missing coastal districts. Nothing was deleted. On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:14 AM, muzirian wrote: > Also wasn't districts boundaries

Re: [Talk-in] Indian Districts

Also wasn't districts boundaries some imports? I have noticed problems with districts in Kerala, they still need much correction. Regards, Kelvin On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Naveen Francis wrote: > Hi > > How we make sure that all districts are mapped ? > Is district

[Talk-in] Indian Districts

Hi How we make sure that all districts are mapped ? Is district boundaries are getting deleted ? http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/o8d Few districts in MH and GJ are missing Thanks, naveenpf ___ Talk-in mailing list Talk-in@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-in] Indian districts tagging

1. place=district makes sense. We should change this. Great, have updated the wiki - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India/Boundaries#Administrative_divisions and will change the values from county to district. 2. Looking at

Re: [Talk-in] Indian districts tagging

1. place=district makes sense. We should change this. 2. Looking at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative it seems like admin_level=6 is a popular choice for a district level unit in the other big countries, larger than India. Its a good idea to use 6 for consistency.

[Talk-in] Indian districts tagging

Currently I see that we have tagged most of the Indian districts(more than 300) with place=county[1] but this tag is mainly used on nodes rather than on administrative boundaries ways that are tagged with boundary=administrative.[2] But we have added administrative boundaries for all districts