Chiesto pubblicamente attribuzione via Twitter:
https://twitter.com/alesarrett/status/1185771106730422272
Vediamo se ci lavorando...
Ale
On 19/10/19 23:03, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 19. Oct 2019, at 20:20, Andreas Lattmann wrote:
Buongiorno,
su cellulare non sembra
いいださん
コメントありがとうございました。
＞鶏小屋
たしかに、当事者じゃないと、用途は分からないわけで…。
ところで、台風20号が来るらしいという予測に驚いています（台風が多過ぎです！）。
細々とですが、またマッピングに戻ります。
On 2019-10-18 12:00, talk-ja-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Talk-ja
メーリングリストへの投稿は以下のアドレスに送ってください．
talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
Webブラウザを使って入退会するには以下のURLにどうぞ．
On 20/10/19 08:45, cleary wrote:
I would like to confirm that the inclusion of qualifiers such as
"closed" or "freight only" in the name is NOT appropriate.
+1 for not appropriate. Use the description tag.
e.g.
railway=station
name = xx (closed)
or
railway=station
name=xxx
On 19/10/19 20:44, Ewen Hill wrote:
Thanks Warin,
I have been using a node or polygon for the railway station as
follows however it is raising a level 2 error in osmose...
name=xxx
historic:railway = station (or station_site)
I think osmose may be complaining that it is not an area?
If
Grazie per tutte le info!
Vedo cosa riesco a combinare.
Intanto, da novizio, sto provando ad estrarre con overpass un excel con la
suddivisione in colonne dei vari dati inerenti ai numeri civici... vediamo
se ci riesco...
Il giorno ven 18 ott 2019 alle ore 21:03 Martin Koppenhoefer <
Thank you; and apologies - that's the image I meant.
On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 23:22, Rob Nickerson wrote:
>
> Curious. I'm struggling but here is another photo that shows more of the
> surroundings. I'll keep poking around.
>
> https://www.airteamimages.com/pics/94/94944_800.jpg
>
> Rob
>
>
> On
Curious. I'm struggling but here is another photo that shows more of the
surroundings. I'll keep poking around.
https://www.airteamimages.com/pics/94/94944_800.jpg
*Rob*
On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 22:16, Andy Mabbett
wrote:
> I'm trying to pinpoint the former location of Hay Mills Rotor Station:
I would like to confirm that the inclusion of qualifiers such as "closed" or
"freight only" in the name is NOT appropriate.
e.g.
railway=station
name = xx (closed)
or
railway=station
name=xxx (freight only)
I understand both are inappropriate uses of the name tag and should not be
I'm trying to pinpoint the former location of Hay Mills Rotor Station:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hay_Mills_Rotor_Station
a helidrome that operated in south Birmingham from June 1951 to
January 1954. The coordinates I have used in that article are an
estimate, based on the photo seen
Pozdrav svima,
07.12. u 17h u Španskih boraca 3a je zakazano prvo (?) okupljanje domace
OSM zajednice. Sačuvajte datum i vidimo se, nadam se u što većem broju!
Nema neke posebne teme sastanka, hajde da se za početak skupimo i
upoznamo. Znamo da će doći ljudi iz Microsoft-a koji su radili
sent from a phone
> On 19. Oct 2019, at 20:20, Andreas Lattmann wrote:
>
> Buongiorno,
> su cellulare non sembra che diano l'attribuzione, sbaglio?
>
> https://www.ilmeteo.it/portale/radar-italia
confermo, solo a leaflet, ma non ad OpenStreetMap
Ciao Martin
Buongiorno,
su cellulare non sembra che diano l'attribuzione, sbaglio?
https://www.ilmeteo.it/portale/radar-italia
Grazie.
Andreas
--
樂
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
I agree that the official classifications by the DPWH does not correspond
very well with those of OSM's. This is also true for some countries as
well. But I still see trunk class matches with national primary (with some
exceptions) and primary class with national secondary (with a handful of
Hi,
I am not convinced that we should take DPWH's road classifications with
great weight in refining OSMPH's road classification. Note that "National
Road" does not mean that the road is functionally important but rather it
only means that DPWH is the government agency in charge of maintaining
So wie ich es verstanden haben waren die Gegen Positionen vorallem gegen
automatische Edits welche durch mechanische Edits nicht mehr gültig sind.
Ebenfalls habe ich es so verstanden das der tag der tag sehr nützlich für viele
data user ist weshalb es sich meiner Meinung nach lohn es manuel zu
Hallo,
ich hatte hier auf der Liste nicht den Eindruck, dass sich die Mehrheit
dagegen ausgesprochen hat. Es war eher eine kritische Betrachtung, um
mögliche Probleme auszuloten, die ich hier herausgelesen habe.
Grüße
Sebastian
Am 17.10.19 um 21:32 schrieb Michael Brandtner via Talk-de:
Ich habe nun die maproulette Challenge erstellen
Ihr könnt sie unter https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/9951
finden.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ferdi
Ferdinand schrieb am Fr., 18. Okt. 2019, 00:26:
> Die letzten endes beste Lösung wird wohl eine maproullete Challenge sein
> das sollte dann
Il giorno dom 6 ott 2019 alle ore 11:36 Andrea Albani
ha scritto:
>
>
>
> Il giorno dom 6 ott 2019 alle ore 09:59 Ivo Reano ha
> scritto:
>>
>> Sono d'accordo con Ferruccio, l'argomento è interessante; dovrebbe essere il
>> modo con cui i senior aiutano chi affronta le sue prime mappature.
>>
Il sab 19 ott 2019, 11:26 liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu <
liste.gira...@posteo.eu> ha scritto:
> Il 19/10/19 11:13, demon_box ha scritto:
> > Francesco Ansanelli wrote
> >> ...
> >> Da quanto ho capito la situazione è questa:
> >>
> >> building=apartments
> >> building:use=retail
> >>
> >>
Il 19/10/19 11:37, demon_box ha scritto:
> liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu wrote
>> forse commercial, perchè
>> comunque qualcosa si vende.
>
> no perchè "commercial" in OSM non è inteso come vendita ma come uffici e
> servizi...
>
>
If it was outside of the UK it is very unlikely that the edits by the
employee would be considered anything protectable outside of them adding
a substantial extract of data from a database that is protected by EU
database regulation.
In the UK however I suppose there is a chance of the edits,
Thanks Warin,
I have been using a node or polygon for the railway station as follows
however it is raising a level 2 error in osmose...
name=xxx
historic:railway = station (or station_site)
If the building can be traced, I would also add a polygon
building=train_station
There appears to be a
For ones that do not exist at all I have modified some near me to
railway:historic station_site
which was recommended to me some time back. Example
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4395763814/history
If there's a building there, and it's no longer acting as an actual station
then I'd also
liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu wrote
> forse commercial, perchè
> comunque qualcosa si vende.
no perchè "commercial" in OSM non è inteso come vendita ma come uffici e
servizi...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial
--enrico
--
Sent from:
Il 19/10/19 11:13, demon_box ha scritto:
> Francesco Ansanelli wrote
>> ...
>> Da quanto ho capito la situazione è questa:
>>
>> building=apartments
>> building:use=retail
>>
>> Corretto?
>>
>
> no intendo un'altra cosa, ripeto ho un edificio (costruito appositamente per
> quell'uso) che è
Francesco Ansanelli wrote
> ...
> Da quanto ho capito la situazione è questa:
>
> building=apartments
> building:use=retail
>
> Corretto?
>
no intendo un'altra cosa, ripeto ho un edificio (costruito appositamente per
quell'uso) che è INTERAMENTE ad esempio bar o ristorante: è corretto in
Ciao Enrico,
Secondo me, sta facendo confusione tra il tipo di edificio e la
destinazione d'uso...
Se aprono un bar in una villa, rimane una villa! Vedi wiki:
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:use
Da quanto ho capito la situazione è questa:
building=apartments
building:use=retail
ciao, dubbio
se guardo il wiki per il corretto uso di building=retail
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:building%3Dretail
è pacifico che lo utilizzo in presenza di negozi
ma se invece ho TUTTO l'intero edificio che è ad esempio un bar oppure un
ristorante posso usarlo lo stesso o
On 19/10/19 17:53, Ewen Hill wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to get some clarity about tagging old railway stations
like
https://i1.wp.com/judithsalecich.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/The-former-Bogantungan-Railway-Station.jpg?ssl=1 that
has not seen a train stop for a numbe of decades
Ah and perhaps we should distinguish between the employee whose manager
says, "Put this into OSM" and the employee who thinks, "My employer doesn't
care how I get the job done, so hang this proprietary GIS she's given me,
my job is so much easier on OSM and she'll thank me for using it."
On Sat,
Thank you both. To clarify, this is in the UK, where I am in discussion
with two organisations.
>From a purely legal perspective, can I simply plough on trying to invest
them in the usefulness of OSM on the basis that, if any employer became
unhappy, their remedy is against their employee for
Hi,
I am trying to get some clarity about tagging old railway stations like
https://i1.wp.com/judithsalecich.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/The-former-Bogantungan-Railway-Station.jpg?ssl=1
that
has not seen a train stop for a numbe of decades
There appears to be a myriads of ways to tag
32 matches
Mail list logo
