>It's not documented anywhere at the moment, but the different coloured
>markers on the "nameless" maps at e.g.
>https://osm.mathmos.net/nameless/amenity/place_of_worship simply
>denote the type of OSM object: node, way or relation.
>
>Robert.
Hi Robert, the nameless places of worship report
>After a quick look at his edits locally he has also been removing ref
>tags from roundabouts which seems an odd thing to do.
This seems perfectly reasonable to me - the roundabout is a junction of various
roads and I do not consider it to be part of a referenced highway.
I note that the wiki
>> this point if we're actually advocating the hitherto undocumented usage of
>> segregated=yes to mean 'cycleway is separate from main carriageway' because
>> I suspect I'm not the only one whose been using it as per the wiki to show
>> where bicycles and pedestrians have their own designated
>I have been doing some tidying based on Osmose, including the warning for
>highway=footway foot=yes, which is often left over >from a preset in Potlatch
>1.
>
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87672607
>
>I got a changeset comment querying the edit.
Hi Andrew,
My understanding is that
I note that ref:usrn was added to the Key:ref wiki in May 2017 and I can see no
real reason to add GB into the key, especially if it is upper case. There are
lots of examples of other country specific tags which do not include a country
code on that page, in fact I can't see a single one that
I think the tag should indicate the primary market and should be consistent.
From the Farmfoods home page, "Farmfoods are the Frozen Food Specialists. Our
roots are embedded in the distribution and handling of frozen food."
That seems pretty definitive to me.
Supermarkets often sell a few
In my view we need to be putting out a consistent UK wide message (preferably
parish name, type and number) and not confusing potential mappers by having
different formats in different counties. We have enough trouble already with
path references variously being put in name, ref or local_ref
>Highway=no seems acceptable to me where a path is permanently physically
>blocked by a building or such-like. We're not serving anyone by directing
>people into wals. I do, however, disagree with its use to tag definitive
>rights of way which are useable but which merely deviate from the route a
Hi Dave,
I have been using this data for several years and it appears to be updated
around about weekly. It is probable that the review date refers to the page,
not the data that it links to, which is on an entirely different server - The
actual CSV is at
The data at
https://data.gov.uk/dataset/e373eb6a-fffd-48e5-b306-71eb17f97af2/pharmacies
looks like an out of date copy of the NHS data to me. You can use the data at
https://www.nhs.uk/about-us/nhs-website-datasets/ which is regularly updated.
It even includes an opening hours file which can
Perhaps setting both building=yes and disused: building=apartments would
fulfill all the needs.
Regards,
Mike
On 18 Dec 2019, 12:00, at 12:00, talk-gb-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
>Send Talk-GB mailing list submissions to
> talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via
I would prefer not to see cycleway:lane=mandatory as this suggests that
cyclists have to use the lane when set. In the UK, the significance of the
solid white line separating a cycle lane and main carriageway is that motor
vehicles are not allowed to use the cycle lane, but cyclists can use
Hi Robert, Looks interesting. I've signed in and had a look. However, the first
one I looked at is a petrol station, and the wiki indicates that shop=yes is
the correct tagging as an additional tag for amenity=fuel. Hence I suggest that
these be omitted from the list requiring replacement.
Hi Mike,
I call them fat man's agony and consider them to be a type of stile.
See
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_fat_man%27s_agony_-_geograph.org.uk_-_945142.jpg
Mike B.
-Original Message-
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:18:46 +0100
From: Michael Collinson
To: OSM talk-gb
You could also add government=transportation to office=government
Regards,
Mike
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I think that if an intersecting highway and waterway are mapped just as lines,
then these represent the full width of the highway and waterway and it is
illogical to use a line or area to represent the ford. If either the highway or
waterway is mapped as an area then I would expect the ford to
16 matches
Mail list logo
