Re: [Talk-at] Adressdaten des BEV

2017-03-27 Per discussione Thomas Konrad
Hallo! > Bei Dörfern ohne benannte Straßen wird der Ortsname in addr:street statt > addr:place geschrieben (das kannst Du natürlich nicht steuern). In addr:city > steht der Gemeindename, was oft, aber nicht immer eine gute Idee ist > (manchmal ist die Katastralgemeinde gebräuchlicher). Das

Re: [Talk-de] Drei Tage mit dem Plug-In Hybrid

2017-03-27 Per discussione Harald Hartmann
> Alles in allem: das Thema Elektromobilität ist wirklich noch sehr > ausbaufähig in Deutschland. Jepp, alles bekannt, wurde auch bereits im Forum mehrfach diskutiert: - Bitte amenity=charging_station rendern [1] - Wie Ladestationen (amenity=charging_station) für Autos erkennen? [2] -

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wijzigingen n.a.v. Circulatieplan Gent

2017-03-27 Per discussione Marc Gemis
opmerkingen gemaakt. In het kort voor pragmatische redenen - geen access: , is nu niet de norm, geen enkel navigatie system gebruikt het. Dus ik raad af van het te gebruiken/promoten. - access=private ipv access=permit. Eindresultaat is hetzelfde en wordt tenminste begrepen door

Re: [talk-au] Tasmanian Vegetation

2017-03-27 Per discussione Warin
Suggest mapper https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/RoundCircle as they added the south west data. On 28-Mar-17 11:12 AM, Karl Howard wrote: Hello, I have been pointed in this direction in relation to my query in OpenStreetMap Help

[talk-au] Tasmanian Vegetation

2017-03-27 Per discussione Karl Howard
Hello, I have been pointed in this direction in relation to my query in OpenStreetMap Help (https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/55283/who-can-help-fix-the-tasmania-australian-vegetation ) I hoping that someone here will be able to assist me with the following query; "When viewing the

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] State of the Map France : appel à contributions

2017-03-27 Per discussione Philippe Verdy
La page wiki est déjà à jour avec les deux liens. Le 28 mars 2017 à 00:25, Vincent de Château-Thierry a écrit : > Bonsoir à tous, > > Comme vous avez pu le lire ici-même [1], notre prochain State of the Map > se déroulera du 2 au 4 juin à Avignon. Pour la constitution du

[OSM-talk] MapRoulette newsletter

2017-03-27 Per discussione m
Hi all, I am working on a monthly MapRoulette newsletter. You can read the March edition in my diary: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/40756 Thanks to everyone who tried MapRoulette recently and also to everyone who made

[OSM-talk-fr] State of the Map France : appel à contributions

2017-03-27 Per discussione Vincent de Château-Thierry
Bonsoir à tous, Comme vous avez pu le lire ici-même [1], notre prochain State of the Map se déroulera du 2 au 4 juin à Avignon. Pour la constitution du programme, chacun a toute latitude pour proposer un sujet et un format d'intervention, au travers de ce formulaire en ligne :

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Re: Anomalies FANTOIR non répertoriées

2017-03-27 Per discussione Philippe Verdy
Merci, voilà une commune qui est complète sur tous ses lieux FANTOIR (y compris les rues en construction). J'avais pris celle-là car la liste n'est pas trop longue à rapprocher et valider. Cela fait une remontée à la source FANTOIR qui donnera son avis et fera éventuellement des corrections, on

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

2017-03-27 Per discussione Warin
You will have an objection from me! Source tags on features within the OSM data base have not been depreciated to my knowledge.. if they were I would more to revert that depreciation. On 28-Mar-17 01:06 AM, nwastra wrote: Jochen, ridding the osm of these unnecessary source tags seems like a

[Talk-us] Need Your Help!

2017-03-27 Per discussione moira walsh
Hello, I'm in StCloud, Minnesota. I'm planning a Mapathon for April. I need technical support, remote or on the ground. Date and time are up to you. I need to decide on those as soon as possible, but have waited to ensure we can fit your time schedule. We'll be working on Missing Maps

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] covered=yes

2017-03-27 Per discussione osm . sanspourriel
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3657729323 Est-ce que ça vous semble bon (au vu de la photo IGN) ? J'aurais mis shelter=yes. J'hésite pour covered=yes qui correspond bien au cas d'extrusion dans un bâtiment mais qui pour une station correspond à une station enterrée/demi-enterrée. Le

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Re: Anomalies FANTOIR non répertoriées

2017-03-27 Per discussione Vincent de Château-Thierry
Le 27/03/2017 à 20:06, Philippe Verdy a écrit : Montgermont (35189) cite par exemple deux rues en fait situées à La Chapelle-des-Fougeretz au Nord ou Saint-Grégoire à l'Est (ce cas est pour des communes limitrophes, mais ces rues ne sont pas frontalières). J'ai d'autres cas mais je n'ai pas

Re: [Talk-it] Attacco di mandata per autopompa

2017-03-27 Per discussione Simone
Il 27 marzo 2017 22:50:31 CEST, Alberto ha scritto: >@ Simone, purtroppo l'allegato non è arrivato... > >Per quanto riguarda la ISO UNI EN 7010:2012, mi pare non abbia un >simbolo apposta per gli attacchi di mandata. A meno che non si intenda >il generico

Re: [Talk-it] Attacco di mandata per autopompa

2017-03-27 Per discussione Daniele Forsi
Il 27 marzo 2017 22:50, Alberto ha scritto: > @ Simone, purtroppo l'allegato non è arrivato... come no? A me è arrivato e si trova anche nell'archivio della lista https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-March/058046.html -- Daniele Forsi

Re: [Talk-it] Attacco di mandata per autopompa

2017-03-27 Per discussione Alberto
@ Simone, purtroppo l'allegato non è arrivato... Per quanto riguarda la ISO UNI EN 7010:2012, mi pare non abbia un simbolo apposta per gli attacchi di mandata. A meno che non si intenda il generico "attrezzature antincendio" [1] [1]

Re: [Talk-ca] Telenav mapping turn restrictions

2017-03-27 Per discussione Pierre Béland
Bonjour Martin, La requête ci-dessous permet de voir les relations type=restriction pour le sud du Québec et l'est de l'Ontario (ie. Ottawa, Cornwall).http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nOZ Pour indiquer les restrictions aux intersections, le nombre de relations type=restriction a explosé depuis 2015 

[OSM-talk-fr] covered=yes

2017-03-27 Per discussione osm . sanspourriel
Je sais, le sidaction c'est fini mais ce n'est pas pour cela que j'écris. covered=yes Sur http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_parking covered =* Le parking est protégé des intempéries par un toit. Sur

[Talk-de] Drei Tage mit dem Plug-In Hybrid

2017-03-27 Per discussione Max
Hi, hier eine kleine Anekdote, die aber vielleicht Relevanz hat für das mappen von Ladestationen. Am Wochenende war ich mit dem Plug-In Hybrid unterwegs. Zuerst Leipzig. Also mal auf OSM geschaut (maps.me) wo es eine Ladestation gibt. Und tatsächlich, da waren welche. Vor der Säule musste

Re: [talk-latam] Inundaciones en Perú, el HOTOSM, y el satelite inservible.

2017-03-27 Per discussione Juan Jose Iglesias
Creo que el pedido deberian hacerlo a el Centro Nacional de Operaciones de Imágenes Satelitales (CNOIS) del Peru Y un Satelite con Orbita Polar Heliosincronica como es el PeruSAT

[OSM-co] Fwd: RV: USAID Data Jam de Desarrollo Rural - Invitación al evento de lanzamiento

2017-03-27 Per discussione hyan...@gmail.com
Hola, les envío este recorderis para el Data Jam http://www.datajamdesarrollorural.co/ saludos, Humberto Yances -- Mensaje reenviado -- Buenas tardes, De manera cordial me permito enviar la pieza del evento para que por favor nos apoyes difundiendo la imagen para las

Re: [Talk-at] Gerade auf der OSM gesehen: 3D tags

2017-03-27 Per discussione Günther Zinsberger
Hallo! Oute mich somit auch als gelegentlicher 3D-Mapper. Wenn ich schon die Bilder (z.B. Mapillary oder OSC) habe, dann ist es ein Leichtes, die Stockwerke abzuzählen und einzuzeichnen. Die Fassadenfarbe lässt sich leicht mit einem Grafikprogramm (z.B. gimp mit der Pipette) aus dem Bild

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Anomalies FANTOIR non répertoriées

2017-03-27 Per discussione Philippe Verdy
Montgermont (35189) cite par exemple deux rues en fait situées à La Chapelle-des-Fougeretz au Nord ou Saint-Grégoire à l'Est (ce cas est pour des communes limitrophes, mais ces rues ne sont pas frontalières). J'ai d'autres cas mais je n'ai pas tout relevé. On s'en aperçoit quand la liste des rues

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Anomalies FANTOIR non répertoriées

2017-03-27 Per discussione Vincent de Château-Thierry
Bonsoir Le 27/03/2017 à 19:48, Philippe Verdy a écrit : Je suis tombé sur des cas où le FANTOIR a créé des codes pour des nom de rues qui ne sont même pas dans la bonne commune (erreur sans doute de saisie du code commune) Donc introuvable dans la commune A (avec le code commune indiqué) mais

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Osmose et arrêts de bus

2017-03-27 Per discussione Noémie Lehuby
Bonsoir, Moi j'aime bien ton idée de lever une erreur Osmose sur un arrêt de bus ayant un "numéro de quai", mais pas de nom. Par contre, je ne suis pas sure que l'utilisation de "local_ref" soit très répandue pour cet usage : j'ai le sentiment d'avoir surtout vu des numéro de lignes dans ce

[OSM-talk-fr] Anomalies FANTOIR non répertoriées

2017-03-27 Per discussione Philippe Verdy
Je suis tombé sur des cas où le FANTOIR a créé des codes pour des nom de rues qui ne sont même pas dans la bonne commune (erreur sans doute de saisie du code commune) Donc introuvable dans la commune A (avec le code commune indiqué) mais manquante dans la commune B. Cette rue n'est même pas

Re: [Talk-it] Attacco di mandata per autopompa

2017-03-27 Per discussione girarsi_liste
Il 27/03/2017 19:01, Andreas Lattmann ha scritto: >> Purtroppo c'è confusione nella >cartellonistica e come già detto, >> >all'estero il più delle volte nel cartello c'è >solo una scritta con una >> fiamma, o solo >la scritta. > > In Italia è in vigore il D. Lgs. 81/08, anche se negli ultimi

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Arrêts de bus sans nom dans MAPS.ME

2017-03-27 Per discussione Noémie Lehuby
Jean-Yvon, je n'ai pas développé MAPS.ME, juste une sur-couche mettant en valeur des arrêts bus où un "re-survey" est nécessaire : je ne peux pas vérifier ce que les gens tapent dans les champs de l'appli ... D'ailleurs, il n'y a pas de commentaire de changeset défini par l'utilisateur dans

[talk-latam] Inundaciones en Perú, el HOTOSM, y el satelite inservible.

2017-03-27 Per discussione opengislab
Un país con el agua al cuello, y un satelite inservible. En los ultimos dias se han presentado desastres concatenados a raiz de las altas lluvias en Perú, cerca del 80% del país afectado: * A - Perú afronta uno de los desastres naturales más fuertes de las últimas décadas, con

Re: [Talk-it] Attacco di mandata per autopompa

2017-03-27 Per discussione Andreas Lattmann
>Purtroppo c'è confusione nella >cartellonistica e come già detto, >all'estero >il più delle volte nel cartello c'è >solo una scritta con una fiamma, o solo >>la scritta. In Italia è in vigore il D. Lgs. 81/08, anche se negli ultimi mesi si stanno adottando i simboli della ISO UNI EN

Re: [Talk-it] Attacco di mandata per autopompa

2017-03-27 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-03-27 15:40 GMT+02:00 Alberto : > O almeno disegnare una freccia ben visibile che mostri che l'acqua entra e > non esce da lì. > Personalmente non userei nemmeno il simbolo dell'idrante. > > +1 perché non usiamo una semplice scritta "Löschwassereinspeisung"

Re: [Talk-ca] Telenav mapping turn restrictions

2017-03-27 Per discussione m
Hi all, Thanks for your thoughtful commentary. First off, our mapping team’s only objective is to improve the map for us and for everyone. In doing this we always respect the work of local mappers, and follow community conventions. None of our edits are automated. There is a person using

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

2017-03-27 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-03-27 16:20 GMT+02:00 Dave F : > Individual entities can have multiple source tags added at different > times. It would be far harder to 'track' their sources if only add to > changesets. When editing an object you can instantaneously see the sources > if added

Re: [Talk-in] How shall we handle multiple railway=station tags at the same place?

2017-03-27 Per discussione muzirian
Your suggestion sounds good, isn't landuse=railway good? what alternative is available? On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Srihari Thalla wrote: > I am not sure if this is discussed earlier, but what shall we do? > > We can trace and tag the buildings with

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wijzigingen n.a.v. Circulatieplan Gent

2017-03-27 Per discussione joost schouppe
Aangevuld! Als er iemand is die tégen access=permit is, dan vooral naar de hackpad gaan :) Seppe, als je wil, maak ik nog snel een Meetup event aan voor jullie. Wie weet komt er dan nog meer volk (ook al is het nogal last minute). Je kan ook zelf "Suggest a meetup" doen. Op 27 maart 2017 om

[Talk-in] How shall we handle multiple railway=station tags at the same place?

2017-03-27 Per discussione Srihari Thalla
I am not sure if this is discussed earlier, but what shall we do? We can trace and tag the buildings with building=train_station but shall we update the areas with landuse=railway (or maybe something better)? [1] http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nOB [2]

[OSM-talk-fr] [13 mai] journée vélo et outils OSM avec l'association MDB

2017-03-27 Per discussione althio
L'association MDB - Mieux se Déplacer à Bicyclette - va réunir ses antennes locales (Île-de-France) en mai et en profiter pour faire une journée de formation sur les outils de cartographie (OpenStreetMap et uMap). Cette journée va se dérouler le samedi 13 mai au PROTO204 à Bures-sur-Yvette (campus

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Addr Import

2017-03-27 Per discussione Glenn Plas
On 27-03-17 16:08, Sus Verhoeven wrote: > Bedankt voor de link, zou het niet goed zijn deze ergens op de wiki te > zetten ? - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/GRB (onderaan) - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GRBimport (in het midden) Ze staat er reeds op. En reeds paar

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

2017-03-27 Per discussione Dave F
Comments inline: On 27/03/2017 09:41, Jochen Topf wrote: Putting the sources on the objects has been deprecated for a while. Which wiki describes that? The source should be put on the changeset only. Apart from JOSM, which editors allow that? If you are doing edits that involve several

Re: [Talk-at] Gerade auf der OSM gesehen: 3D tags

2017-03-27 Per discussione eest9
Am 27. März 2017 um 16:05 schrieb realadry : > Dinge wie einzelne Bäume mappen, kann für manche Zwecke sinnvoll sein, da > man dadurch "alle Daten" am selben Ort (OSM) hat und nicht zig verschiedene > Datensätze von irgendwelchen Behörden durchforsten muss. Ich seh das auch ganz

[OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

2017-03-27 Per discussione nwastra
Jochen, ridding the osm of these unnecessary source tags seems like a good candidate for our MapRoulette challenge. :) Putting the sources on the objects has been deprecated for a while. The source should be put on the changeset only. If you are doing edits that involve several different

Re: [Talk-it] OsmAnd+ in oferta su Play a 3,69€

2017-03-27 Per discussione Alessandro
Buongiorno, anche oggi ho visto che costa 3,69€ https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.osmand.plus=it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[talk-ph] landuse = farm

2017-03-27 Per discussione David Groom
I've just seen this discussion on the main OSM talk list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-March/077741.html The standard OSM rendering will soon drop the rendering of "landuse = farm". There are : 66 Relations 7,390 ways 71 Nodes (interestingly the wiki did not recommend

Re: [Talk-at] Gerade auf der OSM gesehen: 3D tags

2017-03-27 Per discussione realadry
Hallo, Es geht glaub ich nicht grundsätzlich um das mikromappen, sondern darum WIE es gemacht wird. OSM ist eine Datenbank und kein Leinwand auf die gemalt wird. d.h. die Daten müssen vorrangig für Maschinen lesbar sein und in einer effizienten Art und Weise gespeichert sein. z.B. wenn

[OSM-talk-fr] Easy Transport devient Jungle Bus + shooting vendredi à Paris

2017-03-27 Per discussione Florian LAINEZ
Salut, Je vous parle depuis quelques temps de bus avec le projet Easy Transport et l'appli Bus Contributor On est une petite bande de motivés (moi, Noémie, Vincent, Flora, Jean-Louis, Jean et j'en passe) qui souhaite améliorer

Re: [Talk-at] Gerade auf der OSM gesehen: 3D tags

2017-03-27 Per discussione Robin Däneke
Hallo allesamt, zu dem Thema sage ich: Warum nicht. Einerseits kann man diese Daten ja auch sinnvoll auswerten und rendern (http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=48.1723633=16.3679153=19=17.229) andererseits sehe ich die Aufgabe der OSM so an, dass die Welt, so genau wie möglich modelliert werden soll.

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

2017-03-27 Per discussione David Jenne
In most of my edits, a source tag for the changeset would be appropriate. But how does one go about doing this using the ID editor? The only possible entry point I can see is in the "Changeset Comments" section. Thanks, Dave > -Original Message- > From: Andy Townsend

Re: [Talk-it] Attacco di mandata per autopompa

2017-03-27 Per discussione Alberto
> Quindi il solo simbolo è fuorviante, dovremo renderizzare simbolo + scritta O almeno disegnare una freccia ben visibile che mostri che l'acqua entra e non esce da lì. Personalmente non userei nemmeno il simbolo dell'idrante. Tanto se dobbiamo comunque modificare il cartello tanto vale

[OSM-talk-be] Organizing OSM in Belgium: official meeting

2017-03-27 Per discussione joost schouppe
Hi, Some time back we invited all of you to become an OpenStreetMap Belgium member. We're now 100! Those members were then invited to a meeting in Brussels. Ten of us did so. During the meeting, we introduced a very simple constitution [1]. We also elected our very first board, consisting of Ben

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wijzigingen n.a.v. Circulatieplan Gent

2017-03-27 Per discussione Santens Seppe
Hallo allemaal, Ik heb hieronder een kort overzicht toegevoegd van welke tagging (volgens mij) nodig zal zijn op de verschillende locaties (overzichtskaart hier te vinden: https://stad.gent/mobiliteitsplan/digitale-kaarten/webkaart-circulatieplan) Alle opmerkingen welkom! (misschien het

[OSM-talk-fr] Marché public données OSM

2017-03-27 Per discussione Donat ROBAUX
Bonjour, Un marché public vient d'être lancé par le STIF (Syndicat des transports IdF ) concernant l'acquisition et maintenance de données vélo sur OpenStreetMap. Cela peut intéresser les entreprise de l'écosystème OSM. http://www.boamp.fr/avis/detail/17-30383/0 Donat

Re: [Talk-at] Gerade auf der OSM gesehen: 3D tags

2017-03-27 Per discussione Lars Schimmer
On 2017-03-27 12:54, Christian Aigner wrote: > Was es nicht so alles auf der OpenStreetMap gibt: 3D tags > > roof:ridge > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321452173 > > > building:colour und building:part > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321455004 > > > Was mit spontan dazu einfällt:

Re: [Talk-at] Gerade auf der OSM gesehen: 3D tags

2017-03-27 Per discussione eest9
Manche Gemeinden setzen OSM auch zur Raumgestaltung ein. Um dann berechnen zu können wo wie viel Sonnenlicht zu wie vielen Stunden am Tag hin kommt ist das eine relevante Information. Aber auch zur allgemeinen gestaltung. Seh darin also nichts schlechtes. Wenn man selbst nichts von diesem

[Talk-at] Gerade auf der OSM entdeckt: 3D-tags

2017-03-27 Per discussione Christian Aigner
Was es nicht so alles auf der OpenStreetMap gibt: 3D tags roof:ridge https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321452173 building:colour und building:part https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321455004 Was mit spontan dazu einfällt: Arbeitsbeschaffung für Micro-Mapper. Quo vadis, OSM? LG, Christian

[Talk-at] Gerade auf der OSM gesehen: 3D tags

2017-03-27 Per discussione Christian Aigner
Was es nicht so alles auf der OpenStreetMap gibt: 3D tags roof:ridge https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321452173 building:colour und building:part https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321455004 Was mit spontan dazu einfällt: Arbeitsbeschaffung für Micro-Mapper. Quo vadis, OSM? LG, Christian

Re: [Talk-it] giovedì 30 marzo - Mapathon 4 Cultural Heritage

2017-03-27 Per discussione Alessandro Palmas
Aggiunto l'evento nelle news (1) e creato il task nel Tasking Manager (2) a cui aggiungeremo info prima dell'evento. Restate in ascolto. Ale_Zena_IT P.S.: a proposito, com'è andata la prima giornata a Mazzano Romano in termini di partecipazione? 1)

Re: [OSM-talk] A tool for picking up settlements tagged as a single building?

2017-03-27 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-03-27 11:56 GMT+02:00 Jean-Marc Liotier : > And while we're at it, the next most frequent building tagging mistake: > outlining the building on orbital imagery at roof level instead of base > level... Explaining that pictures are not always taken from the > vertical usually

Re: [OSM-talk] A tool for picking up settlements tagged as a single building?

2017-03-27 Per discussione Jean-Marc Liotier
On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 13:25:35 -0400 john whelan wrote: > > It's something I've noticed in Africa so its probably not putting new > mappers through a month's training first but many villages have been > mapped but tagged as a single building with building=yes. > > They

Re: [Talk-it] Relazione percorso tematico

2017-03-27 Per discussione Alfredo Gattai
> > > io tendo a non includere quelli. 50-100 metri mi sembrano ancora "vicino", > ma imagina una via del vino con vineti a chilometri di distanza, oppure un > punto di vista in cima di una montagna, dove vedi 100km e più. Se includi > non solo il percorso (e relativa segnaletica, information

Re: [Talk-it] Relazione percorso tematico

2017-03-27 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-03-27 11:10 GMT+02:00 Cascafico Giovanni : > M'è venuto un dubbio: è possibile inserire in una relazione "route" > elementi che non sono funzionali alla percorrenza? che diresti di formalizzare il tema? Ho trovato: topic https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/topic

Re: [OSM-talk] Changing Bing to bing

2017-03-27 Per discussione moltonel 3x Combo
On 6 March 2017 5:41:01 PM GMT+01:00, Andy Townsend wrote: >On 06/03/2017 07:32, Werner Poppele wrote: > > I'd also suggest that >whatever it is in JOSM that's recommending this be changed so as not >to. A couple of times in the past I've suggested that JOSM's rules be

Re: [Talk-it] Relazione percorso tematico

2017-03-27 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-03-27 11:10 GMT+02:00 Cascafico Giovanni : > M'è venuto un dubbio: è possibile inserire in una relazione "route" > elementi che non sono funzionali alla percorrenza? > > Per esempio, un percorso tematico della prima guerra mondiale potrebbe > anche includere (oltre ad i

Re: [Talk-it] Relazione percorso tematico

2017-03-27 Per discussione Simone
Il 27 marzo 2017 11:10:30 CEST, Cascafico Giovanni ha scritto: >M'è venuto un dubbio: è possibile inserire in una relazione "route" >elementi che non sono funzionali alla percorrenza? > >Per esempio, un percorso tematico della prima guerra mondiale potrebbe >anche includere

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

2017-03-27 Per discussione Andy Townsend
On 27/03/2017 09:41, Jochen Topf wrote: Putting the sources on the objects has been deprecated for a while. Ahem. Just because _you_ don't do it, doesn't make it "wrong". Yes, where a whole bunch of stuff has been added from one source (or a combination of sources), of course it makes

Re: [Talk-lt] OpenStreetMap bendravimo kanalai Lietuvoje

2017-03-27 Per discussione Tomas Straupis
Sveiki Dar liko kelios dienos iki apklausos rezultatų paskelbimo/apibendrinimo. O tuo metu Aurimas jau sukūrė OpenStreetMap forumo šaką Lietuvos temoms, kuriose rasite Lietuvos žymėtojus ir kurioje galėsite bendrauti lietuviškai. Pridėjau forumo prisijungimo informaciją į wiki:

[Talk-it] Relazione percorso tematico

2017-03-27 Per discussione Cascafico Giovanni
M'è venuto un dubbio: è possibile inserire in una relazione "route" elementi che non sono funzionali alla percorrenza? Per esempio, un percorso tematico della prima guerra mondiale potrebbe anche includere (oltre ad i segnavia ed i tabelloni informativi) anche gli oggetti stessi del tema (bunker,

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

2017-03-27 Per discussione Jochen Topf
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 03:56:43PM +1000, nwastra wrote: > I am unsure what is the preferred way or best practice to tag the source for > multipolygons. > I currently put the source on the relation with all the rest of the tags, and > only adding tags to individual ways or inner polygons if they

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

2017-03-27 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-03-27 9:46 GMT+02:00 David Fox : > Amendments within changesets can have multiple sources. Each entity can > have multiple sources. sure, you can add multiple sources to the changeset. Cheers, Martin ___ talk

Re: [Talk-it] Attacco di mandata per autopompa

2017-03-27 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-03-27 9:48 GMT+02:00 Francesco Pelullo : > Ne sto ordinando uno, sul catalogo italiano/inglese del produttore > (Ziggiotto) viene indicato come "delivery coupling unit". > > http://www.ziggiotto.it/docd.php?id=53= > > Pagina 74 e succ. > delivery coupling unit è un

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Upcoming removal of landuse=farm in the standard style

2017-03-27 Per discussione Julien Minet
+ 1 for a wiki page about landuse/landcover mapping in Belgium. I once found this interesting page about mapping the environnement in OSM in Ukraine: http://www.50northspatial.org/map-nature-openstreetmap-approaches-issues-key-tags/. I think the OSM tagging should be adapted to

Re: [Talk-cz] iD editor Strava

2017-03-27 Per discussione Petr Holub
> Ahoj, všiml jsem si že přestal fungovat iD editor s podporou tras Strava > heat. Nefunguje > přepínání běh / kolo / oboje, nefunguje zarovnávání podle tras. Zbylo tam jen > zeleně zobrazené > vše v jednom, jen do zoomu 15. > Je to škoda, byl to užitečný nástroj. > Nepředpokládám, že je chyba

Re: [Talk-it] tool per controllare gli edits in un'area ERA Fwd: [OSM-talk] Responding to vandalism

2017-03-27 Per discussione Max1234Ita
Francesco Pelullo wrote > Il 26 mar 2017 13:16, "Cascafico Giovanni" > cascafico@ > ha scritto: > > Nessuna memoria di massa. Se non ho visto male, la cartella con il > software > occupa 3-5 Mb > > > Ho sperimentato varie soluzioni con alcuni Raspberry 2 accessi 24/7, a > lungo termine (3-6

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

2017-03-27 Per discussione David Fox
Amendments within changesets can have multiple sources. Each entity can have multiple sources. On 27 March 2017, at 08:29, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone > On 27 Mar 2017, at 07:56, nwastra wrote: > > I am unsure what is the

Re: [Talk-it] Attacco di mandata per autopompa

2017-03-27 Per discussione Francesco Pelullo
Il 27 mar 2017 8:59 AM, "paolo bubici" ha scritto: Ecco un attacco di mandata per autopompa con relativo cartello presente: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4757417419 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Dry_riser_inlet.jpg Ne sto ordinando uno, sul catalogo

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Upcoming removal of landuse=farm in the standard style

2017-03-27 Per discussione Marc Gemis
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:42 AM, joost schouppe wrote: > That is just an example. Basically I would wish we had a wiki page as > detailed as the one about bicycle lane tagging for landuse and related > stuff. I agree on the need of a wiki page with lot's and lot's of

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

2017-03-27 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 27 Mar 2017, at 07:56, nwastra wrote: > > I am unsure what is the preferred way or best practice to tag the source for > multipolygons. as with any edit, the source should be put on the changeset (i.e. the object which represents the edit), not on

Re: [Talk-it] Attacco di mandata per autopompa

2017-03-27 Per discussione paolo bubici
Ecco un attacco di mandata per autopompa con relativo cartello presente: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4757417419 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Dry_riser_inlet.jpg Non so se il cartello è a norma di legge ma siccome è utilizzato in un'area pubblica di in Ospedale pubblico Vi

[Talk-cz] Uprava OTM - Smirci kameny

2017-03-27 Per discussione Tom Ka
Ahoj, po diskuzich s Petr1868 a Marianem jsem upravil i stranku OTM pro Smirci kameny dle "nemeckeho" vzoru: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:WikiProjekt_%C4%8Cesko/OTM_zna%C4%8Dkov%C3%BD_kl%C3%AD%C4%8D#N.C3.A1bo.C5.BEensk.C3.A9_objekty oprava vychazi z:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Upcoming removal of landuse=farm in the standard style

2017-03-27 Per discussione joost schouppe
> My garden is a forest (really) and also, well, my garden; and then also part > of a residential area. You could use the all of the following tags on the area of your garden: landuse=residential leisure=garden access=private landcover=trees leaf_cycle= leaf_type= as a wrote a few months

Re: [Talk-it] parti di uno stesso edificio

2017-03-27 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 26 Mar 2017, at 21:34, demon.box wrote: > > Ciao scusate, domanda piatta piatta... > Se ho un edificio composto da più parti attigue ma con caratteristiche > diverse: ad esempio ai 2 lati esterni è un edificio classico (4 mura ed un > tetto) ma in

[Talk-cz] iD editor Strava

2017-03-27 Per discussione Milan Cerny
Ahoj, všiml jsem si že přestal fungovat iD editor s podporou tras Strava heat. Nefunguje přepínání běh / kolo / oboje, nefunguje zarovnávání podle tras. Zbylo tam jen zeleně zobrazené vše v jednom, jen do zoomu 15. Je to škoda, byl to užitečný nástroj. Nepředpokládám, že je chyba jen na mé

[OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

2017-03-27 Per discussione nwastra
I am unsure what is the preferred way or best practice to tag the source for multipolygons. I currently put the source on the relation with all the rest of the tags, and only adding tags to individual ways or inner polygons if they are also part of a seperate entity like a fence or a body of