Re: [Talk-at] OSM Nominatim Adress Suche in Wien

Friedrich K. Volkmann schrieb: > Fazit ist jedenfalls, dass nicht das BEV, sondern die Gemeinden und > die Post die Adressen bestimmen und dass sie ihre Daten selten in > verwertbarer und zuverlässiger Form zur Verfügung stellen. > Darum ist ein Mapping vor Ort immer noch zuverlässiger ist als

Re: [Talk-it] via con due nomi

> Per la tua attività direi che sono importanti principalmente: > - strade > - edifici > - farmacie, stazioni delle ambulanze e simili punti > - numeri civici > defibrillatori > PS se hai a bordo già il navigatore probabilmente ha registrato delle > tracce gps, che potresti usare per

Re: [Talk-at] OSM Nominatim Adress Suche in Wien

On 15.02.2018 07:54, Johann Haag wrote: Du schreibst Zitat: Mein Häuserblock hat 5 Adressen: eine pro angrenzender Straße, und eine weitere weil sich die Wohnhausanlage noch einen Häuserblock weiter zu einer anderen Straße erstreckt./Zitat Eine Person kann sich nun schwerlich zugleich an fünf

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] *** BULK *** Re: Une alternative à Pakku ?

J'ai cherché "pakku" sur github, trouvé plein de chose, mais rien en rapport :( Un peu dommage ces projets qui s'appuient sur de l'open et qui ne sont pas si open... Le 14 février 2018 à 15:00, Vincent Bergeot a écrit : > Le 14/02/2018 à 12:42, REBOUX Maël a écrit : > >

[OSM-talk-fr] Interprétation de lanes et lanes:bus

J'ai hérité d'un certain nombre d'erreurs Osmose sur l'avenue du Prado à Marseille : https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/error/1594768 sur voirie bidirectionnelle, (“lanes”=8) ≠ (“lanes:forward”=3) + (“lanes:backward”=3) + (“lanes:both_ways”=None) − (0 sur voies partielles) − (non

Re: [Talk-at] OSM Nominatim Adress Suche in Wien

On 14.02.2018 23:58, Johann Haag wrote: in Österreich gibt es ein amtliches elektronisches Gebäuderegister genannt AGWRII. In diesem Register enthaltenen Adressdaten dienen per fester Datenverknüpfung (NTZ-Adresscodes) als Basis für das Zentrale Melderegister. Konkret man kann sich im

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

If two ways enter a roundabout at the same point, you can turn from road A into road B instantly, but going from B to A will require going around the entire roundabout. For a router to detect this, it would have to check (for every encountered node): 1) is this a part of a roundabout? 2) if yes,

Re: [Talk-at] OSM Nominatim Adress Suche in Wien

>Das ist Österreich, wie ist das nun in Wien gelöst. Basiert dort das >Meldewesen ebenfalls auf AGWR Adresscodes, oder hat >Wien mit eigenen OGD >Adressen eine andere Lösung?, Und in welchem Kontext dazu stehen die vom BEV >>veröffentlichten Adressen. Inwiefern wäre das fürs Mappen

Re: [Talk-at] OSM Nominatim Adress Suche in Wien

Frage, in Österreich gibt es ein amtliches elektronisches Gebäuderegister genannt AGWRII. In diesem Register enthaltenen Adressdaten dienen per fester Datenverknüpfung (NTZ-Adresscodes) als Basis für das Zentrale Melderegister. Konkret man kann sich im Meldeamt nur auf Adressen anmelden die es im

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 19:23:39 +0100 Johan C wrote: > The present tagging (used since 2005 or so, and all around the globe) > is fine. I agree, I see no problem with this recommendation. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-br] Como mapear Polícia Rodoviária?

Prezados, No caso das polícias rodoviárias federais, algumas etiquetas que podem vir sempre, além de amenity=police, são: 1. police=traffic_police ou police=road_police A etiqueta não-oficial police=* [1] segue a ideia geral usada em vários outros casos no OSM de definir novas etiquetas para

Re: [OSM-talk] Limitations on mapping private information

On 15-Feb-18 12:29 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2018-02-14 14:10 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny >: On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 00:50:32 +0100 Tom Pfeifer > wrote: >

Re: [Talk-at] Neighbourhoods in Wien

On 07.02.2018 21:29, Stefan Nagy wrote: glaubst du, die Leute von links und rechts der Nikolsdorfer Straße erkennen sich dort als Nikolsdorfer? Es wär interessant, von Tür zu Tür zu gehen und sie zu fragen. Zumindest ob sie was von Nikolsdorf wissen. Bei den jüngeren, zugereisten sind die

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:39:29 + Dave F wrote: > I think I have read it correctly. > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5408566797 > > It is easy to determine this shared node is part of the roundabout as > well as the entrance from Wapping & can exit along

[Talk-it-lazio] Fwd: [Talk-it] FOSS4G-IT 2018 ci siamo quasi

inoltro il messaggio di Alessandro Palmas su talk.it per la conferenza OSM-it (dentro FOSS4G-IT). il 22 Febbraio a Roma. -- Forwarded message -- From: Alessandro Palmas Date: 2018-02-14 19:54 GMT+01:00 Subject: Re: [Talk-it] FOSS4G-IT 2018 ci siamo

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

On 14/02/2018 18:32, Andy Townsend wrote: Having one exit node not joined to the next entry node better represents the real-world situation*. Disagree. Sharing a node should make no difference to the real world or a router's perception of it. DaveF.

Re: [Talk-it] FOSS4G-IT 2018 ci siamo quasi

Il 12/02/2018 21:07, Alessandro Palmas ha scritto: Ciao lista, siamo a -7 all'inizio di FOSS4G-IT #foss4git E oggi siamo a -5. I numeri di iscritti continuano a crescere. II giorno 22 per ora vede 50 persone iscritte e le mail e

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

It doesn't work like that anywhere in OSM. I can cross a road that I'm not allowed to drive on. The router does not need to know anything about the road that I'm crossing and I can always cross a road that I'm not allowed to enter. It would make mapping extremely awkward if that were not so.

Re: [Talk-cz] Seznam poštovních schránek České pošty

Dne 14.2.2018 v 18:36 Marián Kyral napsal(a): > Ahoj, > povedlo se toto vyřešit? Ono těch nepřesností bude asi více. Tak by bylo > fajn to nahlásit, ať to máme v dalším souboru opravené :-D Ano. Mám od Dalibora (tuším) kontakt na paní v ČP a to Brno jsem ji poslal. Slíbila, že v dalším exportu to

Re: [Talk-es] Importación de Catastro. Correcciones en archivos de tareas y subida de archivos al repositorio en línea

Lo puedes eliminar con un editor de texto tipo nano o vi, o abrirlo en QGIS. También me lo puedes mandar y yo lo hago. Para el gestor de tareas tienes que usar la cuenta que te haya habilitado Alejandro. Supongo que será la normal. Reconocerás cuál tiene permisos porque sale la opción crear

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Une alternative à Pakku ? (BBBike)

J'utilise bbb pour les zones où ni Geobabrik ni OSM France ni bbb d'ailleurs n'ont de pbf près à utiliser. Un inconvénient c'est que les fichiers à la demande ne sont disponibles qu'après génération (si, si ;-)) et que pendant 24 h. Si tu as besoin de les recréer, il est possible de

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

On 14/02/2018 18:23, Johan C wrote: No, they are not. Roundabouts are special types of intersections. Which is another type of intersection. They have a way on which you can drive round. And round. And round. And they have other ways leading to and from this round way. Whenever you enter the

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

(... snip ...) Technically speaking you are not because you are just touching one node of the roundabout. Yes you are. You may not be on there very long, but you approach the roundabout, pass the signs saying it's a roundabout, give way to those already on it, you enter it & then indicate that

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

2018-02-14 18:50 GMT+01:00 Dave F : > On 14/02/2018 17:13, Maarten Deen wrote: > >> On 2018-02-14 17:39, Dave F wrote: >> >>> I think I have read it correctly. >>> >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5408566797 >>> >>> It is easy to determine this shared node is

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Une alternative à Pakku ?

Ca dépend des thèmes et du format. mapswithoutborders.eu propose les routes et les rails. Avec un tuto pour expliquer comment ils ont fait les extractions. Ce n'est pas du niveau débutant ;-). 40 minutes pour une extraction monde sur un portable. OpenStreetMapData : thèmes terres/eaux/trait

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

On 2018-02-14 18:50, Dave F wrote: On 14/02/2018 17:13, Maarten Deen wrote: On 2018-02-14 17:39, Dave F wrote: I think I have read it correctly. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5408566797 It is easy to determine this shared node is part of the roundabout as well as the entrance from

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare le aree protette

2018-02-14 18:48 GMT+01:00 Dario Crespi : > Anch'io avevo trovato solo licenze non compatibili con la ODbL (molti ad > esempio usano la CC-BY). > per la compatibilità con i contributor terms la cc-by è molto meglio, ma richiede un waiver per osm, oltre alla licenza.

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

On 14/02/2018 17:13, Maarten Deen wrote: On 2018-02-14 17:39, Dave F wrote: I think I have read it correctly. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5408566797 It is easy to determine this shared node is part of the roundabout as well as the entrance from Wapping & can exit along Commercial, or

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare le aree protette

Anch'io avevo trovato solo licenze non compatibili con la ODbL (molti ad esempio usano la CC-BY). Anche qui credo che si potrebbero prendere dati (boh, ditemelo voi), ma la licenza non lo permette. Però per WLE abbiamo il patrocinio del Ministero dell'Ambiente, quindi possiamo provare a chiedere

Re: [Talk-es] Importación de Catastro. Correcciones en archivos de tareas y subida de archivos al repositorio en línea

Gracias, Javier. Ya he subido los archivos de tareas al repositorio en línea. El único que no he subido es el que quedaba vacío tras las correcciones. También he intentado eliminar el polígono de la tarea correspondiente en el fichero 'zoning.geojson', pero no he conseguido averiguar cómo

Re: [Talk-cz] Seznam poštovních schránek České pošty

Dne 27.8.2017 v 19:16 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > Dne 13.4.2017 v 06:38 Dalibor Jelínek napsal(a): >> Ahoj, >> >> povedlo se mi sehnat kontakt na člověka, který by měl >> >> mít na České poště na starost vytváření seznamu poštovních schránek. >> >> Nechci ho ale zveřejňovat na Internetu. Jestli

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

On 14/02/2018 16:50, Colin Smale wrote: Based on my experiences with mkgmap it's not so much a routing problem as a navigation problem. The router will pick the correct path through the graph but the translation to "human instructions" get confused, like the exit numbers and the way the

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare le aree protette

2018-02-14 18:19 GMT+01:00 liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu < liste.gira...@posteo.eu>: > Il 13/02/2018 22:21, Massimo A. ha scritto: > >> se interessa il *Natura 2000 Network Viewer* riporta tutte le >> codificazioni europee delle aree protette, con la possibilta´ di scaricare >> le singole

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare le aree protette

Il 13/02/2018 22:21, Massimo A. ha scritto: se interessa il *Natura 2000 Network Viewer* riporta tutte le codificazioni europee delle aree protette, con la possibilta´ di scaricare le singole schede e i "kmz" di ogni area europea. http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/ M. Tutto molto bello, però

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

On 2018-02-14 17:39, Dave F wrote: I think I have read it correctly. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5408566797 It is easy to determine this shared node is part of the roundabout as well as the entrance from Wapping & can exit along Commercial, or if required, continue around the

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

Based on my experiences with mkgmap it's not so much a routing problem as a navigation problem. The router will pick the correct path through the graph but the translation to "human instructions" get confused, like the exit numbers and the way the roundabouts display. Turning right at a

Re: [Talk-GB] [Talk-gb-westmidlands] New Severn-Trent Aquifer in Edgabaston

I would guess it's at their works by the Reservoir On 13 February 2018 at 22:53, Andy Mabbett wrote: > I was just reading: > >https://www.stwater.co.uk/yourwater > > about how Birmingham's water supply from the Elan Valley is now > supplemented by water from an

[Talk-GB] Licensing compatibility

Hi Following my blog criticising BT for not releasing data, Inlink UK have been in touch saying they'd be only too glad to release their data so we can use it in OSM. They've asked the following

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

I think I have read it correctly. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5408566797 It is easy to determine this shared node is part of the roundabout as well as the entrance from Wapping & can exit along Commercial, or if required, continue around the roundabout: How is this different from, say,

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

On 2018-02-14 15:53, Dave F wrote: Hi Could anyone give me an explanation for this line from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout "Each road has to be connected with the roundabout in a separate node—that is, between these nodes a segment of the roundabout is required."

Re: [OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:53:07 + Dave F wrote: > I see no requirement for a separate segment: Can you give example of roundabount (preferably, with good aerial images) where such requirement makes mapping problematic?

[OSM-talk] Roundabouts - why is a separate segment required?

Hi Could anyone give me an explanation for this line from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout "Each road has to be connected with the roundabout in a separate node—that is, between these nodes a segment of the roundabout is required." I see no requirement for a

[Talk-lt] Nuorodos į žemėlapį

Sveiki Nesudėtinga, bet naudinga informacija, kaip dalintis žemėlapio informacija: https://blog.openmap.lt/2018/02/14/nuoroda-i-zemelapio-vieta/ -- Tomas ___ Talk-lt mailing list Talk-lt@openstreetmap.org

[OSM-talk-fr] Polygones depuis openstreetmap.fr

Bonjour, J'utilise de temps en temps http://polygons.openstreetmap.fr/ pour générer des fichier .poly (polygone) depuis des relations d'OpenStreetMap. Je n'avais jamais trop exploré l'outil ni les finesse des fichiers .poly vu que ça semblait fonctionner habituellement, mais je viens de devoir

Re: [Talk-it] Rastrelliere per biciclette a Bologna

> > 2018-02-14 14:19 GMT+01:00 Lorenzo Perone : > > Effettivamente la funzione prevalente da evidenziare è il tipo di > fissaggio per il telaio, quindi sarei propenso di utilizzare il tipo > "bollard" aggiungendo nel wiki la foto corrispondente al nostro caso. un

Re: [Talk-cz] m.openstreetmap.cz -- moc nefunguje

2018-02-13 21:58 GMT+01:00 Pavel Machek : > Ahoj! > >> ta stranka se zobrazi na *.openstreetmap.cz pokud neni extra nadefinovana. >> co by jako na tom m.openstreetmap melo byt? >> ono tam bylo nekdy neco zvlastniho? > > No, ja bych cekal ze to bud ze to nebude existovat, a nebo ze to

Re: [Talk-it] Rastrelliere per biciclette a Bologna

2018-02-14 14:19 GMT+01:00 Lorenzo Perone : > > Direi che mappare le rastrelliere come area non è conveniente, ed anche usare > due tag non mi convince. > Effettivamente la funzione prevalente da evidenziare è il tipo di fissaggio > per il telaio, quindi sarei propenso

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] *** BULK *** Re: Une alternative à Pakku ?

Le 14/02/2018 à 12:42, REBOUX Maël a écrit : Oui : le GROS avantage de Pakku c’était des données thématisées et prêtes à l’emploi. Les outils BBIKE et donc Overpass on les connaît mais c’est déjà un niveau « expert » et il y a des contraintes sur la taille des extractions. oui je suis

Re: [Talk-it] Rastrelliere per biciclette a Bologna

2018-02-14 14:19 GMT+01:00 Lorenzo Perone : > Ciao, > grazie per i suggerimenti. > Direi che mappare le rastrelliere come area non è conveniente, ed anche > usare due tag non mi convince. > dipende sempre dalle dimensioni, ovviamente. Nel tuo caso specifico può essere

Re: [OSM-talk] Limitations on mapping private information

2018-02-14 14:10 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny : > On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 00:50:32 +0100 > Tom Pfeifer wrote: > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_ > mapping_private_information > > What I miss is some generic "do not map completely

Re: [Talk-it] Inserimento tariffe

2018-02-14 14:23 GMT+01:00 Gabriele Perrini : > questi tag che mi avete proposto vengono poi letto su opentripplanner dove > andrò a fare la simulazione? > non credo, ma lo dovresti guardare tu ;-) Ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Inserimento tariffe

questi tag che mi avete proposto vengono poi letto su opentripplanner dove andrò a fare la simulazione? Il giorno mer 14 feb 2018 alle 14:18 Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > potresti usare conditional e la chiave "fee". > > Non è molto usato, perché questo genere di

Re: [Talk-it] Rastrelliere per biciclette a Bologna

Ciao, grazie per i suggerimenti. Direi che mappare le rastrelliere come area non è conveniente, ed anche usare due tag non mi convince. Effettivamente la funzione prevalente da evidenziare è il tipo di fissaggio per il telaio, quindi sarei propenso di utilizzare il tipo "bollard" aggiungendo nel

Re: [Talk-it] Inserimento tariffe

potresti usare conditional e la chiave "fee". Non è molto usato, perché questo genere di dati è difficilmente manutenibile con la quantità e composizione dei mappatori di OSM. L'ideale sarebbe agganciare i dati in maniera dinamica dall'operatore (ma solitamente dati del genere non sono

Re: [OSM-talk] Limitations on mapping private information

On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 00:50:32 +0100 Tom Pfeifer wrote: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information What I miss is some generic "do not map completely private data". For example, while mapping amenity=place_of_worship in Europe is OK,

Re: [Talk-it] Inserimento tariffe

From : "Gabriele Perrini" perrinigabri...@gmail.com Date : Wed, 14 Feb 2018 13:36:15 +0100 Subject : [Talk-it] Inserimento tariffe > Salve, > ho appena finito di mappare il servizio bike sharing nella Città di Palermo. > Ho aggiunto i tag relativi ai ciclo posteggi e ai percorsi

Re: [Talk-hr] DORS/CLUC 2018 call for papers

Tenks Hrvoje na informaciji, ja bih cak mogla prijaviti odrzavanje OSM radionice ili lightening talka na temu disaster mappinga s OSM-om, tim se bavim i svaku godinu na Young Surveyors konferencijama drzim edukacije :-) On Feb 14, 2018 13:00, wrote: Talk-hr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] *** BULK *** Re: Une alternative à Pakku ?

Challenge : un geopackage avec des styles ? Message original De : REBOUX Maël Date : mer. 14 févr. 2018 à 12:45 À : "'talk-fr@openstreetmap.org'" Objet : Re: [OSM-talk-fr] *** BULK *** Re: Une alternative à Pakku ? Oui :

[Talk-it] Inserimento tariffe

Salve, ho appena finito di mappare il servizio bike sharing nella Città di Palermo. Ho aggiunto i tag relativi ai ciclo posteggi e ai percorsi ciclabili. Adesso, in base alla simulazione finale che devo affrontare per la mia tesi universitaria, dovrei andare ad inserire le tariffe relative a tale

Re: [Talk-cz] Schránky - statistiky (aka progress meter ;) )

Ahoj, je to moc pěkné! Do schránek jsem se zapojil a zrovna mi chyběly v POI importeru nějaké schránky. Začal jsem je fotit, abych je tam zanesl ručně a teď je můžu ještě kontrolovat v tabulce. Za mě díky!HonzaDne 14. 2. 2018 8:05 AM napsal uživatel Marián Kyral :Ahoj,trochu jsem

Re: [Talk-cz] Ivan Petrovič [was: Re: Nedělitelné mezery v názvech ulic]

On 2018-02-13, 15:29 GMT, Lukas Gebauer wrote: > To fakt používáte výraz "krtek"? Já to doposud slyšel jen od > moravské náplavy. Spíše jako legrace, ale ano občas jsem to slyšel i v normálním provozu. Když už centimetro není dost zajímavé … Matěj -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber:

Re: [Talk-it] Pagina wiki progetto Avogadro

Il 14/02/2018 12:07, Cascafico Giovanni ha scritto: ciao! Avete poi stabilito uno hashtag per i changeset del progetto? #ASL-Avogadro18 ___ Talk-it mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] *** BULK *** Re: Une alternative à Pakku ?

Oui : le GROS avantage de Pakku c’était des données thématisées et prêtes à l’emploi. Les outils BBIKE et donc Overpass on les connaît mais c’est déjà un niveau « expert » et il y a des contraintes sur la taille des extractions. C’était pour renvoyer qqn vers des données thématiques justement.

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare le aree protette

Ciao, se può esserti utile nella faggeta di monte Raschio insistono tre tipi di protezione diverse che ho mappato con tre relazioni diverse in quanto interessano aree diverse * Relazione: Parco Naturale Regionale di Bracciano - Martignano (6247108 [3]) * Relazione: ZSC

Re: [Talk-in] Mapping India's national geological monuments

Hi there I have just joined Talk-in from UK does anyone have an export file, they have worked on I feel its time for India to move forward but lack in communication. We should join hands and get India mapped together so life get better for everyone more effectively and efficiently. OSM is a

Re: [Talk-it] Pagina wiki progetto Avogadro

ciao! Avete poi stabilito uno hashtag per i changeset del progetto? Il giorno 13 febbraio 2018 15:32, Alessandro Palmas < alessandro.pal...@wikimedia.it> ha scritto: > Il 13/02/2018 15:24, 2020_Lorenzo Finotto ha scritto: > > Salve a tutti, sono uno studente dell'istituto Amedeo Avogadro di

Re: [Talk-transit] OpenMetroMaps workshop in Berlin on February 11

Hi Sebastian, The jungle bus team is also working on such a project for bus networks: https://github.com/Jungle-Bus/VapourTrail Nothing serious yet, but we already learned a lot because we are making progress on this topic since 2 years now. Should we talk about it?

Re: [Talk-it] Area/deposito legname provvisorio.

landuse=industrial comprende già storage, anche se qui "industrial" lo trovo poco pertinente, credo inventando un nuovo landuse=storage si creerebbe confusione tra questi due. man_made=storage storage=pile (indica il tipo di storage facility) substance=wood ? -> substance dice il wiki si

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lot Talk-fr, Vol 139, Parution 16

Bonjour, Pour info on avait publié il y a 3 ans un tuto expliquant 4 méthodes dont BBike et Geofabrik pour importer la donnée OSM sous QGIS : http://blog.cartong.org/2015/05/28/tuto-donnee-osm-sous-qgis/ Ça serait probablement à actualiser par contre ! (et ça ne mentionnait pas Pakku qui

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rencontre parisienne 22 février 2019

Merci de remobiliser du monde Donat :) Ironie, j'arrive de manière permanente à Paris à partir du 22, mais tard le soir. J'en serai donc à partir de la fois suivante François Le 14 février 2018 à 10:47, Florian LAINEZ a écrit : > J'en suis ! > > Cool de relancer ça, merci.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rencontre parisienne 22 février 2019

J'en suis ! Cool de relancer ça, merci. Je trouve ça vraiment bien de fixer un thème de mapping pour qu'on ai tous un objectif commun durant cette soirée. Bien entendu cela reste ouvert aux débutants ... au plaisir de vous y voir. Le 13 février 2018 à 23:48, Donat ROBAUX a

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Une alternative à Pakku ?

Coucou, Le 14/02/2018 à 10:25, Corentin a écrit : > Le site BBBbike permet des export dans différents formats en sélectionnant > une zone sur la carte. > > Voici le lien : https://extract.bbbike.org/ Merci pour le lien, l'interface propose de nombreuses options,

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Une alternative à Pakku ?

Le 14. 02. 18 à 10:17, REBOUX Maël a écrit : > Le site http://pakku.io/ qui permettait de télécharger des données OSM > pré-pakagées n’existe malheureusement plus. > > Existe-t-il une ou des alternatives ? je ne l'ai jamais connu mais quand je lis leur descriptif sur gouv.fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Une alternative à Pakku ?

Le 14/02/2018 à 10:25, Corentin a écrit : Bonjour, Le site BBBbike permet des export dans différents formats en sélectionnant une zone sur la carte. Voici le lien : https://extract.bbbike.org/ idem que mon autre mail, c'est super bbike mais pakk.io c'est bien

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Une alternative à Pakku ?

Le 14/02/2018 à 10:22, Axelos a écrit : Bonjour, Le 14/02/2018 à 10:17, REBOUX Maël a écrit : Le site http://pakku.io/ qui permettait de télécharger des données OSM pré-pakagées n'existe malheureusement plus. Existe-t-il une ou des alternatives ? Je ne connaissais pas ce service, mais

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Une alternative à Pakku ?

Bonjour, Le site BBBbike permet des export dans différents formats en sélectionnant une zone sur la carte. Voici le lien : https://extract.bbbike.org/ Le 14 février 2018 à 10:22, Axelos a écrit : > Bonjour, > > > Le 14/02/2018 à 10:17, REBOUX

Re: [Talk-it] Area/deposito legname provvisorio.

landuse=storage substance=timber ? Forse conviene portare la questione sulla lista tagging. Ci deve essere un tagging esistente per depositi all'aperto, che mi sfugge. On 14 Feb 2018 12:31 a.m., "Martin Koppenhoefer" wrote: > > > 2018-02-12 19:49 GMT+01:00 liste DOT

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Une alternative à Pakku ?

Bonjour, Le 14/02/2018 à 10:17, REBOUX Maël a écrit : > Le site http://pakku.io/ qui permettait de télécharger des données OSM > pré-pakagées n'existe malheureusement plus. > > Existe-t-il une ou des alternatives ? Je ne connaissais pas ce service, mais http://download.geofabrik.de/ devrait

[OSM-talk-fr] Une alternative à Pakku ?

Bonjour, Le site http://pakku.io/ qui permettait de télécharger des données OSM pré-pakagées n'existe malheureusement plus. Existe-t-il une ou des alternatives ? Cdt, Maël REBOUX Service Information Géographique Rennes Métropole Chargé de mission "diffusion" 02 99 86 63 71 Twitter :

Re: [Talk-hr] Eko karta zavoda Andrije Štampara

Prije je bila ideja kreirati na wiki listu stranica koje koriste OSM u RH, pa onda razraditi na one koji imaju pravilnu licencu, i one koji nemaju. Plan je bio napraviti našu internu listu, na iz koje se može ažurirati ona globalna. Pozdrav, Hrvoje On 14.02.2018 01:36, Borut Maricic wrote:

Re: [Talk-it] correggere errore

Non potrebbero essere errori preesistenti? A me capita che al caricamento di qualche modifica Josm mi segnali errori vari nella zona "caricata". Il giorno 14 febbraio 2018 00:16, Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > 2018-02-14 0:04 GMT+01:00 riccardopastoc...@alice.it