On 22/08/14 15:23, Brian Prangle wrote:
I'll leave it to others to judge whether this is data they would want on
the map, but:
Thankful_Village= yes_WWI
Thankful_Village= double_WWIII
I believe that
Thankful_Village=WWI
Thankful_Village=WWI;WWII
would be more in the spirit of the
On 22/08/14 15:50, David Woolley wrote:
Thankful_Village=WWI
Thankful_Village=WWI;WWII
Other things I would want to investigate are whether this can be
generalised to other countries: do the Americans have a similar
category; does it include Korean and Vietnam wars? What about
On 18/08/14 10:59, SomeoneElse wrote:
Whilst the existance of a highway=pedestrian area that isn't connected
is an indication of something, it's usually just an indication of that
mapping in a particular area is not complete.
Considering the longer term problems:
1) There needs to be better
On 18/08/14 12:15, SK53 wrote:
There are plenty of examples of people building routers for people with
restricted mobility using OSM data (for instance wheelchair users, blind
people etc). Most of us will map steps on footways simply because even
one step acts as a barrier to wheelchair users or
On 12/08/14 23:08, Rob Nickerson wrote:
6, The Hollies,
Birmingham Road,
Town,
Cases I've seen are maisonettes and parades of shops.
I've used:
housenumber: 5
street: The Hollies, Birmingham Road
but that is more to ensure the data is captured than because it really
seems right to me.
On 13/08/14 11:36, Will Phillips wrote:
2. I don't agree that tagging only postcode and 'addressable object' is
a good idea. To convert that into a full address requires access to a
closed database. Surely the whole point about OSM is creating useful
It's also a database which is incomplete;
On 13/08/14 12:15, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
They have to maintain a
written List of Streets Maintainable at the Public Expense.
Councils also allocate addresses for streets not maintained at public
expense (and it is my impression that many new residential streets,
including most
On 11/08/14 10:33, Dave F. wrote:
On 05/08/2014 15:00, Curon Davies wrote:
On 5 August 2014 14:25, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
mailto:dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
One reason I haven't added it is because it's illegal (AFAIK. The
owners of the land local councillor failed to reply to my
On 06/08/14 22:29, Dave F. wrote:
Really sorry to say this, but some of your edits have been a bit off. In
JOSM do you load all the data in the area you're editing? I've noticed
you move whole entities, such as fences, but seem unaware that action
affects any joined elements like other fences or
On 05/08/14 12:00, Pavlo Dudka wrote:
There is also nice project Multilingual Map created as part of
Multilingual maps wikipedia
project(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_maps_wikipedia_project).
Unfortunately, the only realisation of this concept that I have found
(not
On 05/08/14 00:37, Lester Caine wrote:
Simply writing a name in a different
alphabet is something that the renderer can do if required.
There is rarely a 1:1 mapping between different alphabets, except within
a single country, and the mapping depends on both source and destination
languages
On 05/08/14 08:05, Pavlo Dudka wrote:
No, I don't want to add name:uk for cities or other objects that were
never mentioned it ukrainian texts. This is redundant.
Unfortunately, there are lots of cases where people add detailed data
that, although possibly not mechanically derivable from
On 04/08/14 16:15, Pavlo Dudka wrote:
Hi! I would like to add ukrainian names for cities of UK, but found that
SomeoneElse_Revert removed some of name:uk-tags in changeset 20757217
with a comment reverting undiscussed Ukrainian translations including
There might be some need to check that:
-
On 03/08/14 17:02, Tom Hughes wrote:
In reality such roads may, even though they are not adopted and are
hence not maintained at public expense, be highways with an associated
right of way for the public.
That's more likely for long established, and probably rural roads. For
recently
On 31/07/14 17:01, Nick Allen wrote:
actual stop was. As a result of this, it is quite possible that there
are stops shown in the right place with the correct tags concerning
shelters, benches, tactile paving, name of stop, timetables or bus route
references displayed, etc, but added to a
On 27/07/14 22:26, ianmspen...@gmail.com wrote:
So there should be a clear tagging that is distinct for the meaning
of “trunk (UK sense)” vs “trunk (International sense)
The logical conclusion of this would be that there would have to be a
different tag for every jurisdiction. In this
On 25/07/14 17:15, Philip Barnes wrote:
Are you proposing we tag for the renderer by not tagging trunk roads as
trunk?
No. He wants people to tag for the router, not the renderer.
I think that is a bad idea, although not as bad when most trunk roads
weren't already mapped, as it is doing
os.openstreetmap.org has been down every time I've tried since last
Sunday. I've tried from two completely unrelated ISPs.
I've googled for news, but found none, and the wiki still quotes it as
the official tile server for OpenData StreetView.
___
Is there any mechanism for reporting and reverting vandalism that
doesn't tend to associate the non-OSM internet identity of the reporter
with their likely physical location. As far as possible I try to avoid
my internet ID and my physical location being associated, but assume
that the OSM ID
On 05/08/13 11:22, SomeoneElse wrote:
David Woolley wrote:
I don't even want to go into too much detail about the nature of the
vandalism here.
If you did want to give an example without making any specific
reference, perhaps you could perform similar vandalism (in a different
place
On 05/08/13 12:37, Craig Wallace wrote:
You can revert it yourself, using the JOSM reverter plugin.
OK Thanks. I suspected something like that must exist, but I'd got to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism, which led me to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GB_revert_request_log,
301 - 321 di 321 matches
Mail list logo
