Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Overpass query?

[John Kennedy]

Good stuff Brian.

Just looking at Cork Airport, it appears that when overpass looks for Civil
parishes inside area["name"="Diocese of Cloyne"] it includes Cork Airport
civil parish for some reason. This may be a limitation of how overpass or
underlying technologies calculate geospatial queries - possibly based on
civil parish centroids, approximation of diocese area by concave hulls etc.
rather than precise polygon boundary definitions.

I won't investigate further but I guess key point is it is always worth
checking overpass query results visually for accuracy too.

Cheerio
 - John



On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 14:46, Brian Hollinshead 
wrote:

> John and Donal, This made it so easy. In under eleven minutes I loaded all
> 87 civil parishes into Josm and Excluding the four in Ardfert, there was
> one duplicate name, selected the 83 I wanted, the downloaded all the
> members, then using John's select the dissolved members I created a new
> Diocese of Cork relation, changed the three enclaves from outer to inner ,
> uploaded the file and sat back. So much easier than any other method.
> many thanks for your interest.
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 12:30, John Kennedy  wrote:
>
> > Hi Brian.
> > Does this work?
> >
> > https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/TnN
> >
> > I attempt to gather all CPs in Cork.
> > Then all CPs in the mapped dioceses.
> > Then take the difference.
> >
> > But I just query by area name - this could be tightened further.
> >
> > Rgds/
> >  - John
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 09:20, Brian Hollinshead 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Donal,
> > > Thanks for having a go at that overpass query. Your offer showed the
> > > Diocese of Ardfert which has perhaps six Cork civil parishes. I had not
> > > included it in my enquiry for fear of complicating it further.
> > >
> > > If you run overpass, include all County Cork on screen and use wizard:
> > > boundary=historic_diocese, the resultant white space is the Diocese of
> > Cork
> > > (1837)  from which i wish to load all the civil parishes into JOSM for
> > > further progress.
> > >
> > > For anyone new to this conversation that is : all the civil parishes in
> > > County cork not already mapped in OSM as parts or all of the Dioceses
> of
> > > Ardfert and Aghadoe, Cloyne or Ross. (as boundary=historic_diocese)
> > >
> > > Further suggestions from anyone more familiar with overpass than I am
> > will
> > > be most welcome.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 00:17, Donal Hunt 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Brian,
> > > >
> > > > I tried to take a stab at this but overpass got the better of me!!
> > > >
> > > > Here is what I've got so far: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Tn4
> > > >
> > > > This will give you an area excluding the two diocese relations you
> > > > mentioned. I think you either need to do a map_to_area or a Recurse
> > > up/down
> > > > relations function after that but I can't wrap my head around that
> part
> > > and
> > > > there are few examples that explain it well enough...
> > > >
> > > > Also - in hindsight, my query result only returns other diocesan
> areas
> > > that
> > > > are not Ross / Cloyne. There are obviously parts of Cork that aren't
> > > > contained within a diocesan area right now.
> > > >
> > > > Hopefully one of the overpass gurus here will put us out of our
> > misery!!
> > > =)
> > > >
> > > > Donal
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 4:38 PM Brian Hollinshead <
> > br...@hollinshead.net
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Overpass query: County Cork comprises the Dioceses of Cloyne, Cork
> > and
> > > > > Ross. I have added Cloyne and Ross as boundary=historic_diocese to
> > OSM.
> > > > > Please can I use overpass to load the remaining civil parishes into
> > > JOSM.
> > > > > Something  like  boundary=civil_parish in "County Cork" BUT NOT
> > > > > (boundary=civil_parish in "Diocese of Cloyne") OR NOT
> > > > > (boundary=civil_parish in "Diocese of Ross). I seem to remember
> that
> > > > > boundary!=xxx omits what follows but am unsure.
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > 

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Overpass query?

[John Kennedy]

Cool. Yep, I was lucky spotted the difference description:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Overpass_QL#Difference

Brian, I just noticed that Cork Airport and nearby are not highlighted in
the results...maybe the civil parish definitions are missing/broken in
those areas.
Rgds/
 - John.

On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 12:52, Brian Hollinshead 
wrote:

> Hi John,
> That is great thank you. It does include the four parishes from Diocese of
> Ardfert but I can cope the that. I did not want all the Cloyne Parishes in
> Cork County lest there would be duplicate names.
>
> Regards
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 12:30, John Kennedy  wrote:
>
> > Hi Brian.
> > Does this work?
> >
> > https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/TnN
> >
> > I attempt to gather all CPs in Cork.
> > Then all CPs in the mapped dioceses.
> > Then take the difference.
> >
> > But I just query by area name - this could be tightened further.
> >
> > Rgds/
> >  - John
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 09:20, Brian Hollinshead 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Donal,
> > > Thanks for having a go at that overpass query. Your offer showed the
> > > Diocese of Ardfert which has perhaps six Cork civil parishes. I had not
> > > included it in my enquiry for fear of complicating it further.
> > >
> > > If you run overpass, include all County Cork on screen and use wizard:
> > > boundary=historic_diocese, the resultant white space is the Diocese of
> > Cork
> > > (1837)  from which i wish to load all the civil parishes into JOSM for
> > > further progress.
> > >
> > > For anyone new to this conversation that is : all the civil parishes in
> > > County cork not already mapped in OSM as parts or all of the Dioceses
> of
> > > Ardfert and Aghadoe, Cloyne or Ross. (as boundary=historic_diocese)
> > >
> > > Further suggestions from anyone more familiar with overpass than I am
> > will
> > > be most welcome.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 00:17, Donal Hunt 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Brian,
> > > >
> > > > I tried to take a stab at this but overpass got the better of me!!
> > > >
> > > > Here is what I've got so far: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Tn4
> > > >
> > > > This will give you an area excluding the two diocese relations you
> > > > mentioned. I think you either need to do a map_to_area or a Recurse
> > > up/down
> > > > relations function after that but I can't wrap my head around that
> part
> > > and
> > > > there are few examples that explain it well enough...
> > > >
> > > > Also - in hindsight, my query result only returns other diocesan
> areas
> > > that
> > > > are not Ross / Cloyne. There are obviously parts of Cork that aren't
> > > > contained within a diocesan area right now.
> > > >
> > > > Hopefully one of the overpass gurus here will put us out of our
> > misery!!
> > > =)
> > > >
> > > > Donal
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 4:38 PM Brian Hollinshead <
> > br...@hollinshead.net
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Overpass query: County Cork comprises the Dioceses of Cloyne, Cork
> > and
> > > > > Ross. I have added Cloyne and Ross as boundary=historic_diocese to
> > OSM.
> > > > > Please can I use overpass to load the remaining civil parishes into
> > > JOSM.
> > > > > Something  like  boundary=civil_parish in "County Cork" BUT NOT
> > > > > (boundary=civil_parish in "Diocese of Cloyne") OR NOT
> > > > > (boundary=civil_parish in "Diocese of Ross). I seem to remember
> that
> > > > > boundary!=xxx omits what follows but am unsure.
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > ___
> > > > > Talk-ie mailing list
> > > > > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> > > > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Donal Hunt
> > > > OpenStreetMap Ireland
> > > > donal.h...@openstreetmap.ie | +353 87 8175123
> > > > ___
> > > > Talk-ie mailing list
> > > > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> > > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
> > > >
> > > ___
> > > Talk-ie mailing list
> > > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
> > >
> > ___
> > Talk-ie mailing list
> > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
> >
> ___
> Talk-ie mailing list
> Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
>
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Overpass query?

[John Kennedy]

Hi Brian.
Does this work?

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/TnN

I attempt to gather all CPs in Cork.
Then all CPs in the mapped dioceses.
Then take the difference.

But I just query by area name - this could be tightened further.

Rgds/
 - John




On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 09:20, Brian Hollinshead 
wrote:

> Hi Donal,
> Thanks for having a go at that overpass query. Your offer showed the
> Diocese of Ardfert which has perhaps six Cork civil parishes. I had not
> included it in my enquiry for fear of complicating it further.
>
> If you run overpass, include all County Cork on screen and use wizard:
> boundary=historic_diocese, the resultant white space is the Diocese of Cork
> (1837)  from which i wish to load all the civil parishes into JOSM for
> further progress.
>
> For anyone new to this conversation that is : all the civil parishes in
> County cork not already mapped in OSM as parts or all of the Dioceses of
> Ardfert and Aghadoe, Cloyne or Ross. (as boundary=historic_diocese)
>
> Further suggestions from anyone more familiar with overpass than I am will
> be most welcome.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 00:17, Donal Hunt 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Brian,
> >
> > I tried to take a stab at this but overpass got the better of me!!
> >
> > Here is what I've got so far: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Tn4
> >
> > This will give you an area excluding the two diocese relations you
> > mentioned. I think you either need to do a map_to_area or a Recurse
> up/down
> > relations function after that but I can't wrap my head around that part
> and
> > there are few examples that explain it well enough...
> >
> > Also - in hindsight, my query result only returns other diocesan areas
> that
> > are not Ross / Cloyne. There are obviously parts of Cork that aren't
> > contained within a diocesan area right now.
> >
> > Hopefully one of the overpass gurus here will put us out of our misery!!
> =)
> >
> > Donal
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 4:38 PM Brian Hollinshead  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Overpass query: County Cork comprises the Dioceses of Cloyne, Cork and
> > > Ross. I have added Cloyne and Ross as boundary=historic_diocese to OSM.
> > > Please can I use overpass to load the remaining civil parishes into
> JOSM.
> > > Something  like  boundary=civil_parish in "County Cork" BUT NOT
> > > (boundary=civil_parish in "Diocese of Cloyne") OR NOT
> > > (boundary=civil_parish in "Diocese of Ross). I seem to remember that
> > > boundary!=xxx omits what follows but am unsure.
> > > Thanks
> > > ___
> > > Talk-ie mailing list
> > > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Donal Hunt
> > OpenStreetMap Ireland
> > donal.h...@openstreetmap.ie | +353 87 8175123
> > ___
> > Talk-ie mailing list
> > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
> >
> ___
> Talk-ie mailing list
> Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
>
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Time-lapse video of map edits

[John Kennedy]

Powerful stuff Heikki. Will give it a whirl when I get a chance. Best of
luck to those in Kilkenny tomorrow
 - John

On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 23:11, Heikki Vesanto 
wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Looks great! Good work.
>
> Using the actual added dates is a bit trickier.
>
> You need the full history extracts for that. Then you can loop through
> it with osmium-tools essentially creating a snapshot. This can be done
> for example with python.
>
> I wrote a guide on it:
> https://gisforthought.com/creating-openstreetmap-history-visualisations/
>
> But the visualization part should work the same as you did here, with
> QGIS and the time manager plugin.
>
> -Heikki
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 10:50 PM John Kennedy 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi. I was able to generate a time-lapse video but it is based on the time
> > data was last edited rather than the time the data was first added.
> >
> > Packaged it up and available here in case anyone finds it useful:
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7xTAJ2j8gI
> >
> > Has anyone suggestions on how to download data from OSM that includes
> time
> > info (for processing in QGIS)?
> >
> > Thanks/
> >  - John.
> > ___
> > Talk-ie mailing list
> > Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
>
> ___
> Talk-ie mailing list
> Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
>
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

[OSM-talk-ie] Time-lapse video of map edits

[John Kennedy]

Hi. I was able to generate a time-lapse video but it is based on the time
data was last edited rather than the time the data was first added.

Packaged it up and available here in case anyone finds it useful:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7xTAJ2j8gI

Has anyone suggestions on how to download data from OSM that includes time
info (for processing in QGIS)?

Thanks/
 - John.
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

[OSM-talk-ie] Introducing the RelationDissolve plugin

[John Kennedy]

Hi all.
For those interested in adding boundaries into OSM, I have developed a
small JOSM plugin to dissolve relations. Intent is to make it much easier
to create boundaries that are based on existing boundaries (e.g. townlands
or EDs). Brian has given v0.1.0 a good hammering and so far so good.

It is called RelationDissolve. Just adds one option to the Relations window
context menu. Documentation here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/RelationDissolve

I don't have much time for further development but appreciate any
suggestions to improve.

I will share with the JOSM developer list too in case they want to
integrate it into core or some of the other plugins.

Best,
 - John
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Mapping project - Mapping Roads

[John Kennedy]

Could KeepRight help? e.g.
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=12=39.95356=-75.12364

Rgds/
 - John

On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 15:38, Colm Moore  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> "roads outside of the main urban areas are not well mapped, having errors
> where roads not properly joined up" - I'm not sure if I concur.
>
> Most days, I use the 'Routing' layer on http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/
> to check for broken connections. I prioritise major roads and the closer
> broken connections. Many of the others are where there are
> highway=corridor. In general, the situation in Ireland is much better than
> it is elsewhere in Western Europe (the number of broken connections appears
> to be somewhat correlated with population density / level of human
> activity).
>
> There are roads that were mapped before we had access to aerial photos
> that are a bit on the 'rough' side, but generally those roads are within 10
> metres of where they should be. Given that aerial photos and GPS devices
> often have offset issues, I think that is a reasonable margin of error.
> Number of lanes, surface, etc will of course be lacking on many roads.
>
> There are two main categories of missing roads - housing estates and farm
> access roads. I map all over the country and I find very few through roads
> that aren't mapped.
>
> Other than the likes of Lauravale:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/668051865#map=16/54.3696/-6.4484 there
> are very few urban locations with serious mappings issues regarding roads.
> This map points to some other under-mapped locations:
> http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/unmapped#5/54.940/-7.559
>
> Is there any tool that measures the km of each type of road in an area?
> This could be compared with the data that councils publish (there are about
> 9,000 housing estate that won't show in these numbers).
>
> --
>
> If looking for things to map / fix, how about targeting local notes,
> fixme=* and FIXME=*?
>
> Colm
>
> 
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:47:40 +
> From: Tadeusz Cantwell 
> To: Discussion of OpenStreetMap in Ireland 
> Subject: [OSM-talk-ie] Mapping project
> Message-ID:
>  dkaxe...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Now that townlands are mostly done, it would be nice to have a new project
> to focus on. A piece of feedback that came out during the launch was that
> roads outside of the main urban areas are not well mapped, having errors
> where roads not properly joined up, as one example. One way to tackle this
> is set up a project on Maproulette to help triage those small errors. A set
> of criteria can be entered into it, which generates a task for everything
> that falls within it. If you have any pet peeves in the state of our
> 'virtual' roads, fire away. Sorry, we can't fix that pothole!
>
> Tadeusz
>
> ___
> Talk-ie mailing list
> Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
>
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

Re: [Talk-br] [OFF] Mudança de email

[John Kennedy Cotta]

Prezados Colegas, estou precisando de uma ajuda.
Eu estou querendo obter o número de ruas de um mapa img.
Usei a ferramenta gpsmapedit e consegui os shapes. Todavia, na tabela dbf
não vieram os números de ruas.
Alguém sabe como obtê-los?

obrigado,

Kennedy

Em 4 de abril de 2016 17:02, Arlindo Pereira 
escreveu:

> Pessoal, só para avisar, estou num processo de encerramento dos meus
> domínios e, com isso, estou mudando meu email de
> openstreet...@arlindopereira.com para *arli...@openstreetmap.com.br
> *.
>
> Obrigado e desculpem pelo off-topic.
>
> []s
> Arlindo
>
> ___
> Talk-br mailing list
> Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
>
>
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br

[Talk-br] Shapefiles dos bairros de Contagem - MG

[John Kennedy Cotta]

Prezados Senhores, chamo-me John e estou precisando do Shapefiles dos
bairros de Contagem - MG. Vi que Vitor Dias foi quem por último atualizou
os dados do OSM.
Alguém os teria e pode me disponibilizá-los.

Agradeço.

Att.,

Kennedy
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br

[OSM-talk-ie] Requesting 17/9 SW

[John Kennedy]

Requesting 17/9 SW pls. [Fermoy/Rathcormack if I am not mistaken]

Thanks,
 - John.
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Inclusion of Barony of .. as prefix to all Barony names?

[John Kennedy]

Having said all that, I just realised that Counties are name = County
Kildare and loc_name = Kildare. So there is a precedent for the
additional text and Barony of  seems as justifiable as County  to
me. I'm happy to adopt whatever the consensus is.

Thanks,
 - John.

PS I know some people who would appreciate visibility on borders for
Municipal Districts -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipal_district_%28Ireland%29. Could
tagging/naming guidelines be proposed for those too?

On 2 December 2014 at 23:39, John Kennedy jkenned...@gmail.com wrote:
 Brian thanks for raising this point - may I broaden it a little?

 I too noticed that some mappers include ED and Civil Parish but
 actually many do not and I haven't noticed any guidance on this
 anywhere for the moment. So it would be good to come to a consensus on
 these terms also.

 Thinking about it a bit, I would suggest we try to find a way to
 improve the readability of the map rather than add the extra text to
 the names of CPs, EDs or Baronies inside the OSM database. For
 example, it might be possible for the renderer of the (really helpful)
 slippymap at http://dev3.openstreetmap.ie/osm/slippymap.html to add
 the extra text automatically, or perhaps the fonts / colours /
 hatching could be tweaked.

 I suggest approaching it from this point of view so we can stick to
 the OSM convention of capturing the what just the once, in the other
 tags only. As well as reducing effort, text, duplication, possibility
 of mistakes, it also allows names to be queried automatically as
 expected. Forgive the ridiculous examples but if somebody wanted to
 analyse how many things start with each letter of the alphabet...we
 don't want them to have to write an exception for Irish Baronies so
 that they start at the 11th character (to skip Barony of ). Or for
 the student who for some reason wants to calculate the average length
 of names of things in OSM, we don't want them to have to subtract 13
 when it comes to length of names of  Civil Parish.

 Just my 2 cents. Thanks for listening, and thanks to everyone who is
 contributing to the townlanding project.
  - John.

 On 2 December 2014 at 10:00, Brian Hollinshead br...@hollinshead.net wrote:
 In County Carlow there is Rathvilly Town, and ED and Civil Parish and
 Barony. Having an interest in Historical boundaries as well as their
 relevance for genealogy I printed out an A1 map of County Carlow with
 townlands and Civil parishes and Baronies.

 Even though the barony names were in a different font size and colour I
 felt it would be more friendly to anyone reading the map to prefix
  Barony of to each barony name where I had not remembered to. I may also
 have strayed into PJNAs wexford with the same in mind. (Sorry PJ)

 Maybe we could reach a gentle consensus  as to how to approach this, I look
 forward to your views. We already include ED  and Civil Parish in their
 titles. I wonder if we are going to includeBarony ofwhether the
 preset magician Donal can prepopulate the name box? No hardship if he can't.
 ___
 Talk-ie mailing list
 Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Inclusion of Barony of .. as prefix to all Barony names?

[John Kennedy]

Brian thanks for raising this point - may I broaden it a little?

I too noticed that some mappers include ED and Civil Parish but
actually many do not and I haven't noticed any guidance on this
anywhere for the moment. So it would be good to come to a consensus on
these terms also.

Thinking about it a bit, I would suggest we try to find a way to
improve the readability of the map rather than add the extra text to
the names of CPs, EDs or Baronies inside the OSM database. For
example, it might be possible for the renderer of the (really helpful)
slippymap at http://dev3.openstreetmap.ie/osm/slippymap.html to add
the extra text automatically, or perhaps the fonts / colours /
hatching could be tweaked.

I suggest approaching it from this point of view so we can stick to
the OSM convention of capturing the what just the once, in the other
tags only. As well as reducing effort, text, duplication, possibility
of mistakes, it also allows names to be queried automatically as
expected. Forgive the ridiculous examples but if somebody wanted to
analyse how many things start with each letter of the alphabet...we
don't want them to have to write an exception for Irish Baronies so
that they start at the 11th character (to skip Barony of ). Or for
the student who for some reason wants to calculate the average length
of names of things in OSM, we don't want them to have to subtract 13
when it comes to length of names of  Civil Parish.

Just my 2 cents. Thanks for listening, and thanks to everyone who is
contributing to the townlanding project.
 - John.

On 2 December 2014 at 10:00, Brian Hollinshead br...@hollinshead.net wrote:
 In County Carlow there is Rathvilly Town, and ED and Civil Parish and
 Barony. Having an interest in Historical boundaries as well as their
 relevance for genealogy I printed out an A1 map of County Carlow with
 townlands and Civil parishes and Baronies.

 Even though the barony names were in a different font size and colour I
 felt it would be more friendly to anyone reading the map to prefix
  Barony of to each barony name where I had not remembered to. I may also
 have strayed into PJNAs wexford with the same in mind. (Sorry PJ)

 Maybe we could reach a gentle consensus  as to how to approach this, I look
 forward to your views. We already include ED  and Civil Parish in their
 titles. I wonder if we are going to includeBarony ofwhether the
 preset magician Donal can prepopulate the name box? No hardship if he can't.
 ___
 Talk-ie mailing list
 Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Maps for townland plotting

[John Kennedy]

Howdy. Working through the videos/process. Some small questions/observations...

Do you want the reserve/freeing process in Mapcraft apply to when you
are editing the townlands in OSM or just when perparing the
map/rectification in mapwarper?

In Josm 7643 importing townland boudaries styles etc I notice the
Irish options do not appear as per youtube video (at least for me):
Irish Map Paint Styles seems to appear in list as townland.mapcss
Irish Tagging Presets seems to appear in list as irishboundaries.xml

Cheers,
 - jk

On 22 October 2014 18:06, Donal Diamond donal.diam...@gmail.com wrote:
 Uploaded:
 http://mapwarper.net/maps/4820

 Good Luck!

 D


 On 22 October 2014 16:52, Mark Tully markjtu...@gmail.com wrote:

 Could I please request 20/21 NW

 Thanks,
 Mark

 On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Donal Diamond donal.diam...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  IRL-GSGS-3906-26-21-NE-Clane.tif  uploaded
 
  http://mapwarper.net/maps/4800
 
  D
 
  On 20 October 2014 16:45, John Kennedy jkenned...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   Impressive work. I would like to request
26/21 NE
  
   Thx,
- John
  
   On 19 October 2014 21:42, Patrick Matthews mullinalag...@gmail.com
   wrote:
Thanks Donal
   
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Donal Diamond 
  donal.diam...@gmail.com
wrote:
   
On 19 October 2014 16:47, Patrick Matthews mullinalag...@gmail.com
 
wrote:
   
 I would like to request

 20-27-NW,
 20-27-SW,
 20-27-SE,
 23-27-SW.

   
Done:
   
   
   
   
  
 
 http://mapwarper.net/maps?field=titlequery=IRL-GSGS-3906-20-27show_warped=0
   
   
   
  
 
 http://mapwarper.net/maps?field=titlequery=IRL-GSGS-3906-23-27show_warped=0
   
Donal
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
   
___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
  
   ___
   Talk-ie mailing list
   Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
   https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
  
  ___
  Talk-ie mailing list
  Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
 
 ___
 Talk-ie mailing list
 Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

 ___
 Talk-ie mailing list
 Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Maps for townland plotting

[John Kennedy]

Impressive work. I would like to request
 26/21 NE

Thx,
 - John

On 19 October 2014 21:42, Patrick Matthews mullinalag...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks Donal

 On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Donal Diamond donal.diam...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 On 19 October 2014 16:47, Patrick Matthews mullinalag...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  I would like to request
 
  20-27-NW,
  20-27-SW,
  20-27-SE,
  23-27-SW.
 

 Done:



 http://mapwarper.net/maps?field=titlequery=IRL-GSGS-3906-20-27show_warped=0


 http://mapwarper.net/maps?field=titlequery=IRL-GSGS-3906-23-27show_warped=0

 Donal
 ___
 Talk-ie mailing list
 Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

 ___
 Talk-ie mailing list
 Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

___
Talk-ie mailing list
Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie