, 2020 at 11:38 AM Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:32 AM Brian Stromberg
> wrote:
>
>> This contradicts the OSM wiki but seems like the only way to avoid
>> confusion.
>>
>
> Much like sport=american_football vs sport=soccer, this makes sense.
an
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 5:37 AM Minh Nguyen
wrote:
> Vào lúc 11:02 2020-09-23, stevea đã viết:
> > On Sep 23, 2020, at 10:51 AM, Brian Stromberg
> wrote:
> >> A short question of a lengthy response: What is the history behind that
> definition of 'suburb'? Is it
A short question of a lengthy response: What is the history behind that
definition of 'suburb'? Is it a result of the term being used that way in
UK/Europe/elsewhere? Seems like an odd usage, since "suburbs" have had a
very clear definition in the United States for decades now, and it has
nothing
map.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> 31 Aug 2020, 05:38 by stevea...@softworkers.com:
>
> On Aug 30, 2020, at 5:50 PM, Brian Stromberg
> wrote:
>
> I would argue that maps can only show the world as the mapmaker wants it
> to be shown, and OSM should probably not be encouraging p
to the degradation of the places we visit.
--
Brian
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 9:28 AM Mike Thompson wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 6:53 PM Brian Stromberg
> wrote:
>
>> I would argue that maps can only show the world as the mapmaker wants it
>> to be shown...
>&g
I would argue that maps can only show the world as the mapmaker wants it to
be shown, and OSM should probably not be encouraging people (in any way) to
be visiting sites that are clearly marked as illegal to visit. This seems
like a bad precedent to set. I would include the bunker but not mark it
is that they are also more accessible for low-income or other
marginalized members of the community, so I think they play an important
role (which makes them worthy of being properly mapped).
--
Brian
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 9:10 AM Kevin Kenny wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 8:33 AM Brian Stromberg
>
Sorry for the flurry of emails. This is all to say that I agree with
Jmapb's description.
--
Brian
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 9:35 AM Brian Stromberg
wrote:
> I think the same rule about MD oversight applies where I live, but I have
> never seen an MD at a clinic. PAs and RNs are mor
When I hear “clinic” in reference to a healthcare facility, I think of
“urgent care” clinics, and I think there are about six urgent care clinics
within a 20 minute drive of my local hospital. These are usually staffed
with nurses and Physicians Assistants rather than MDs. It’s pretty common
in
The only clear definition that has come across this list is whether the
rooms open to the outdoors or to a hallway. All of the others are way too
subjective to be useful to anyone trying to decide how to tag it.
--
Brian
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
>
As someone who does research with Census data, it would be helpful to keep
all Census geographies in place (at least until Census decides to get rid
of them). Someone will use them at some point. Additionally, they're an
official component of Census geographies, as bureaucratic as that might be.
Wow.
I think it at least merits a discussion. Yes, it's a political decision but
not so ridiculous as to dismiss it as part of a feminist plot.
I would also point out that using a gender-specific term like "man" does
more to maintain division than anything else.
--
Brian
On Mar 10, 2017 4:38
that discussion.
--
Brian
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Mike N <nice...@att.net> wrote:
> On 9/7/2016 10:13 AM, Brian Stromberg wrote:
>
>> Automated nationwide mapping seems like it would introduce more problems
>> than it would solve. If maps are intended to represent th
Automated nationwide mapping seems like it would introduce more problems
than it would solve. If maps are intended to represent the truth on the
ground, then the only way to create a useful map is by reporting what is
actually there rather than making assumptions. A map that is inaccurate
because
14 matches
Mail list logo
