Io ho provato prima (verso le 4) e avevo le ortofoto Maxar. Non saprei dirti
che versione JOSM ho installato al momento, ma quando torno a casa ti do
informazioni.
Manuel Tassi
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Ottieni BlueMail
Come scritto qui [1] dovrebbero essere nuovamente disponibili le
ortofoto Maxar sia per ID che per Josm. Dovrebbe essere rilasciata una
nuova versione di Josm con Maxar riattivato. Ho provato, ma sia l'ultima
tested 15806 che latest 15855 non vedo le ortofoto Maxar.
Ciao
Damjan
[1]
Devi disattivare il servizio.
Nel menù "Immagini aeree" e "Preferenze delle foto aeree" si apre una
finestra dove nella parte bassa ci sono i servizi (le immagini di sfondo)
che hai attivato.
Selezioni la riga con "digitalglobe" e poi clicchi sul cestino a destra.
Il giorno sab 15 feb 2020 alle
Non lo uso … ma devo disattivare qualcosa, o non devo fare niente???
Questa scritta andrà via da sola?
> Il giorno 15 feb 2020, alle ore 11:39, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu
> ha scritto:
>
> Il 15/02/20 10:58, riccardopastocchi ha scritto:
>> Da oggi come apro Josm mi compare:
>> Un
Ciao,
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 8:36 PM Francesco Ansanelli
wrote:
>
>
> Il ven 14 feb 2020, 10:24 Martin Koppenhoefer ha
> scritto:
>
>>
>> Am Do., 13. Feb. 2020 um 09:22 Uhr schrieb demon_box <
>> e.rossini7...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>>
>>> appunto, io per ora utilizzo
>>>
>>> craft=appliances_repair
Da oggi come apro Josm mi compare:
Un triangolo giallo con la dicitura: [apiKey] in not validino TMS argument.
Please checkthis server URL:
Https://services.digitalglobe.com/earthservice/tmsaccess/tms/1.0.0/DigitalGlobe:ImageryTileService@EPSG:3857@jpg[zoom]/[x]/[-y].jpg?connectld=[apiKey]
Che
Il 15/02/20 10:58, riccardopastocchi ha scritto:
> Da oggi come apro Josm mi compare:
> Un triangolo giallo con la dicitura: [apiKey] in not validino TMS argument.
> Please checkthis server URL:
>
Ciao,
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 2:54 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> io farei così
>
> oneway=no
> oneway:conditional = yes @ (Mo-Sa 07:45-08:15, Mo-Sa 15:45-16:15)
>
In questo caso il tag oneway=no è inutile.
Ciao,
Andrea
___
Talk-it mailing list
Controllato ora e ho JOSM 15806 con Maxar funzionante [1]
Manuel Tassi
[1] https://i.imgur.com/QPylodB.png
Il 15/02/2020 17:28, Damjan Gerl ha scritto:
Come scritto qui [1] dovrebbero essere nuovamente disponibili le
ortofoto Maxar sia per ID che per Josm. Dovrebbe essere rilasciata una
On 15/02/2020 17:35, Tomek wrote:
- for continents, oceans, poles, and seas bordering any state, I will
completely remove this marker.
Don't do that. The golden rule should be: never remove another mapper's
contribution unless it's incontrovertibly wrong.
Steve
liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu je 15.2.2020 ob 19:22 napisal:
Il 15/02/20 17:28, Damjan Gerl ha scritto:
Come scritto qui [1] dovrebbero essere nuovamente disponibili le
ortofoto Maxar sia per ID che per Josm. Dovrebbe essere rilasciata una
nuova versione di Josm con Maxar riattivato. Ho
Il 15/02/20 17:28, Damjan Gerl ha scritto:
> Come scritto qui [1] dovrebbero essere nuovamente disponibili le
> ortofoto Maxar sia per ID che per Josm. Dovrebbe essere rilasciata una
> nuova versione di Josm con Maxar riattivato. Ho provato, ma sia l'ultima
> tested 15806 che latest 15855 non vedo
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 09:38:03AM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Am Do., 13. Feb. 2020 um 13:42 Uhr schrieb Maarten Deen :
>
> > From wikipedia (if that is an authority)
> >
> it isn't.
getting better and better: we have now a discussion on the labeling
of Antifa, definition of facism,
On 14/02/2020 16:25, stevea wrote:
Or, using unsigned_ref=* is an option.
SteveA
I like this one, thank you.
I just suggested the practice to the people reading the OSM Panama
Telegram group.
MF
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Am Sa., 15. Feb. 2020 um 14:09 Uhr schrieb Andrea Musuruane <
musur...@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 8:36 PM Francesco Ansanelli
> wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> mi sembra adatto come tag.
>>> Purtroppo usato pochino,
>>>
>>> 6x craft=appliance_repair
>>> 3x craft=appliances_repair
>>>
>>> Lo
EO
La diskuto silentiĝis, do mi skribas denove kion mi planas fari:
- por maroj kiuj apudas al iu(j) lando(j), ŝanĝi la etikedon “name” por
enhavi nomojn en oficialaj lingvoj de ĉiuj apudaj landoj, jes, mi scias,
ke tiu nomo povas esti tre longa;
- por kontinentoj, oceanoj, polusoj kaj maroj kiuj
Il 15/02/20 20:06, Damjan Gerl ha scritto:
> Grazie! Ho fatto così (ricarica della lista predefinita) ed ora li vedo
> come layer, però non mi funzionano. Ho anche cancellato la cache. Mi
> dice "Error downloading tiles: INVALID CONNECTED ID: _apiKey_".
> L'indirizzo usato è questo:
>
Il 15/02/20 20:45, Damjan Gerl ha scritto:
> Finalmente sono riuscito a impostarli e mi funzionano:
>
> - cancellato tutta la cache
> - cancellati tutti i layer maxar
> - chiusura e riavvio di josm(latest 15855)
> - update dei layer di default
> - aggiunta dei due layer maxar
> - ora funzionano
>
Perfetto, procedo quindi per quest'ultimo suggerimento.
Grazie a tutti!
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu je 15.2.2020 ob 20:12 napisal:
Il 15/02/20 20:06, Damjan Gerl ha scritto:
Grazie! Ho fatto così (ricarica della lista predefinita) ed ora li vedo
come layer, però non mi funzionano. Ho anche cancellato la cache. Mi
dice "Error downloading tiles: INVALID
Per piacere, non farlo. Non è questa la conclusione della discussione
che si è tenuta qui. Sono stati espressi pareri, e la discussione si è
esaurita, credo perché troppo distanti le posizioni dei partecipanti.
Non, je t'en prie, ne fais pas ça. Ça n'est pas du tout la conclusion de
la
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 04:01:23PM -0500, Mario Frasca wrote:
> On 15/02/2020 15:27, Richard wrote:
> >getting better and better: we have now a discussion on the labeling
> >of Antifa, definition of facism, authority of Wikipedia, what next?
> >
> >* less politics is better for OSM
> >* I would
On 15/02/2020 15:27, Richard wrote:
getting better and better: we have now a discussion on the labeling
of Antifa, definition of facism, authority of Wikipedia, what next?
* less politics is better for OSM
* I would not be happy if anyone could mashup his logo with that of OSM
Richard
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 15 feb 2020, alle ore 14:02, Andrea Musuruane
> ha scritto:
>
>
> Ciao,
>
>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 2:54 AM Martin Koppenhoefer
>> wrote:
>> io farei così
>>
>> oneway=no
>> oneway:conditional = yes @ (Mo-Sa 07:45-08:15, Mo-Sa 15:45-16:15)
>
> In questo
こんにちは、奈良の石川です。
対応ありがとうございました。「該当する (不存在が確認された) POI のみ削除する」「changeset を戻す」「account
を報告する」のどれが適切な対応か分からなかったので、助かりました。
On Thursday, February 13, 2020, 12:42:16 PM GMT+9, Satoshi IIDA
wrote:
いいだです。
ベトナム語翻訳でnameの翻訳などみてみましたが、
明らかにいたずら or 間違い編集っぽかったので、リバートしておきました。
--
石川
Ahoj, je dostupné vydání 498 týdeníku WeeklyOSM:
https://weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/12843
* OSM ČR z.s. zastoupením OSMF.
* Mapathony Brno a Olomouc.
* freemap.sk v Locusu.
* Novinky QA Osmose.
* 80 milionů sad změn.
* Hraniční přechody v Rusku.
* Týdenní mapy pro Maps.Me.
* Reverzní geokódování.
Et oui quand on n'écoute pas ce que disent Christian et Bibi ;-).
Effectivement j'avais fait les mêmes talonnements que toi et j'étais
arrivé à la conclusion :
- relation avec place
- relation avec label (ou admin_centre) dont ce nœud comporte à nouveau
place.
C'est lourd mais précis et ça
> Has anyone seen something similar? Presumably this could happen to
nodes generally, there is no reason to think amenity=post_box is a factor.
Exactly that pattern no - but occasionally new users manage to drag
nodes by accident.
> Is there any way to identify features which have moved by
Note: les ZAC et lotissements ont des frontières précises, qu'on peut
trouver dans les PLU, mais ne pas oublier que les PLU évoluent dans le
temps plus vite que la définition administrative des quartiers. Les ZAC et
lotissements sont très morcelés et n'ont pas vocation à être péreine, une
fois
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 03:41:40PM +, Andy Townsend wrote:
> > Has anyone seen something similar? Presumably this could happen to nodes
> generally, there is no reason to think amenity=post_box is a factor.
The threading here seems to be odd.
Anyway, when I was new to OSM and using an old
les délimitions de quartiers ne sont pas des "landuse=residential". Une
agglomération presque entière, éventuellement pluricommunale, pourrait
former un seul landuse, et pourtant enclaver des zones industrielles ou
commerciales, ou des zones agricoles; de même les quartiers administratifs
During a recent talk to some genealogists I was asked which sources we used
for adding the civil parishes back in the day.
My best memory was grouping the townlands from detail on the Sean Ruad web
(now the core roscommon I think) which is a list from the 1851 index?
Thanks
No problem, I'm just really glad that Airborne Research Australia have
opened this imagery up and allowed OSM to trace from it.
I'm updating it as ARA release new imagery, each time I update the
footprint shown at https://osmlab.github.io/editor-layer-index/ and some
extra processing happening at
Just been reading about the naming of a new road in Bristol "Cheers Drive"
which is apparently a local way to thank a bus/taxi driver
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-bristol-51501412
Thing that caught my eye was the reference to Google Maps having it on
already which made me wonder how,
I've long suspected that local councils and other government bodies are
giving data directly to Google. I've seen developments turn up on Google
maps that couldn't possibly have been established with a survey. It's all
really shady. But at least we can say, even in this case, that OSM is the
more
I once watched a conference presentation on the in-house software Google
use to update their map data (forget where I came across this). While they
didn't reveal full information on it, a large part of their workflow is
semi-automated and mostly comes down to humans reviewing and intervening in
Bonjour,
J'ai fait une première passe, en modifiant, pour les quartiers et les
lotissements, les attributs landuse=residential en place=neighbourhood.
Sans créer de relations cependant.
Par exemple :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570993621
Comme on peut le voir, cela a eu pour effet,
If there's a better place, please direct me appropriately...
I've been using Robert Whittaker's Post Box tool to help fill gaps and
fix anomalies in the CT postal area. I think I've now found a pattern
which leads to "ghost" entries in locations where there has never been a
post box and
Bon dia,Efectivament, no cal. De fet es recomana deixar d'utilitzar aquest tipus d'etiquetes (p. ex. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_in) que es van crear abans de la creació del multipolígons de límits (municipals, comarcals, estatals, continentals, ...) que ara són redundants.Pel
Note, concernant le zonage, il semble qu'on n'ait pas encore dans OSM de
définition des zones d'appellations contrôlées (il y en a aussi dans
d'autres pays européens) pour divers produits agricoles/viticoles ou de la
pêche. Les appellations sont maintenant dans le droit européen, et gérés en
J'ai continue à renseigner des colonnes dans ta feuille
https://lite.framacalc.org/9f0b-osm_ref_fr
Quelques éclaircissements, ajouts de liens et une meilleure utilisation des
colonnes.
Il ne serait pas inutile de mettre des liens pour les colonnes indiquant
"taginfo", avec une recherche carto
Bonjour,
j'ai une petite question pour les admins de openstreetmap.fr.
Je vois que le serveur download.openstreetmap.fr offre non pas
seulement des extraits pbf mais aussi des fichiers 'replication' a la minute.
Depuis quelque temps le format pbf a defini des champs dans le header
pour
I wondered if it might have come from OS OpenData so I downloaded the latest OS
Open Names, but no it isn't there yet.
Unless it's come from OS MasterMap (anyone on here have access to check?), it
does appear the council are collaborating with the goog.
Thanks Graeme and Andrew and yes, the So was an issue but the string is
still causing a validation error. I am not certain if this is a false
positive so might leave it unless anyone has any cunning plans. I do like
the service_hours though.
Ewen
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 at 09:46, Andrew Harvey
I believe the parser doesn't like SH for school holidays, but this is
documented and best practice, so you can ignore the warning until the
parser is fixed.
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 at 11:12, Ewen Hill wrote:
> Thanks Graeme and Andrew and yes, the So was an issue but the string is
> still causing a
Bonjour,
Le 15/02/2020 à 18:38, Sarah Hoffmann a écrit :
> [1]
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PBF_Format#What_are_the_replication_fields_for.3F
>
> Ces champs replication ne sont pas encore disponibles dans les extraits
> sur openstreetmap.fr. Est ce-que ce sera possible de les ajouter
The lighthouse on King Island 665872432 has the following hours which are
throwing up an error in JOSM but I can't see why and secondly, these appear
to be tour times so is there another way of doing this please?
Fr-Tu 11:00, 12:30, 14:00; SH Mo-So 11:00, 12:30, 14:00, 15:15, 16:00
Ewen
Bonjour groupe,
I should soon be able to feed the task manager with tiles containing no more
than 200 buildings each.
I will be using a Quadtree algorithm similar to what was used to split Canvec
map sheets. The problem is that the algorithm creates tiles that keep the
aspect ratio of the data
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 at 07:58, Ewen Hill wrote:
>
> Fr-Tu 11:00, 12:30, 14:00; SH Mo-*So* 11:00, 12:30, 14:00, 15:15, 16:00
>
Is *So* the problem (or just a typo here?)
Thanks
Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
I've done a number of building imports using no square shapes with no
problem. JOSM is set to open up new tasks in a separate layer which avoid
the problem of having task loading next the the just closed task. (I'm
doing the imports in the US using voting districts. Each district typically
has
if you have data and the extents I can setup tasks(send them to me somehow)
On Sat., Feb. 15, 2020, 5:07 p.m. Daniel @jfd553,
wrote:
> Bonjour groupe,
>
> I should soon be able to feed the task manager with tiles containing no
> more than 200 buildings each.
>
>
>
> I will be using a Quadtree
If it's only open for tours then I think this is a reasonable use of
opening_hours. If however it's open all the time (or just other
opening_hours) but then has tours at certain times you can choose to join
I'd use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service_times.
Alternatively you could use
In some cases, the aspect ratio is 1:5, creating long vertical tiles (tasks),
or I may miss something :-)
Sent from Galaxy S7
From: Clifford Snow
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2020 5:36:19 PM
To: Daniel @jfd553
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca]
I think it was the Memorial Atlas of Ireland, provided by NUI Galway. There
was a layer in JOSM for tracing Civil Parishes and Baronies, I can't find it
any more, as our infrastructure has gone done (ie maps.openstreetmap.ie)
Here is the one for Fermanagh on Mapwarper -
Found it, in JOSM add the following imagery:
tms[5,20]:https://mapwarper.net/layers/tile/295/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png
On Saturday, 15 February 2020 14:41:55 GMT Brian Hollinshead wrote:
> During a recent talk to some genealogists I was asked which sources we used
> for adding the civil parishes back
55 matches
Mail list logo
