computer :
> http://totor.110mb.com/bacolod/
>
> We should have a similar result after the reverting.
>
> Regards
>
> Odor
>
>
>
> --- On Sat, 2/27/10, ianlopez wrote:
>
>> From: ianlopez
>> Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Request for revertion. (Was: Fwd: Bac
pez
> Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Request for revertion. (Was: Fwd: Bacolod)
> To: "maning sambale"
> Cc: "OSM-PH"
> Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010, 7:12 AM
> I'll be reverting/removing some
> edits in a while. I'll try not to be a carabao in an
>
I'll be reverting/removing some edits in a while. I'll try not to be a carabao
in an antique shop (meaning I'll try not to screw up other edits)
--- On Sat, 2/27/10, maning sambale wrote:
From: maning sambale
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Request for revertion. (Was: Fwd: Bacol
I suggest we wait for the sysadmins for a while.
They have revert scripts:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Revert_scripts
We can do this as well, but with great power comes great
responsibility. :)) Which I am (personally) reluctant to take on at
the moment.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 2:48 PM,
Maybe we should edit Bacolod ASAP and delete/revert edits attributed to him. Be
careful when reverting, as previously encoded information may be accidentally
removed.
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap
Hi,
We recently noticed some activity in Bacolod Philippines. We
requested the editor to explain the sources (no public trace and hires
imagery available in the area). Based on our exchanges in the OSM
messaging facility, I have reason to believe that the data came from
copyrighted material.
F
