Re: [talk-ph] "VJMEJ Planned" and "Open Paint Maps"

2022-04-16 Thread Jherome Miguel
Evidence are their their diary entries that are basically harassment; those can be easily reported and deleted. Also look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119747584 for an example of their MO of revenge attacks that follow the established MO of Open Paint Maps. When I reverted multiple

Re: [talk-ph] "VJMEJ Planned" and "Open Paint Maps"

2022-04-16 Thread Jherome Miguel
Also see OSMPH Telegram. VJMEJ Planned is already on our radar there. On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 12:13 AM Jherome Miguel wrote: > Evidence are their their diary entries that are basically harassment; > those can be easily reported and deleted. Also look at >

Re: [talk-ph] "VJMEJ Planned" and "Open Paint Maps"

2022-04-16 Thread Jherome Miguel
I just reported their two diary entries. Back on the issue, do you mean we can't discount VJMEJ Planned and Open Paint Maps are the same person? ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] "VJMEJ Planned" and "Open Paint Maps"

2022-04-16 Thread Andy Townsend
On 16/04/2022 13:02, Jherome Miguel wrote: I just reported their two diary entries. Back on the issue, do you mean we can't discount VJMEJ Planned and Open Paint Maps are the same person? As ever, I'd suggest trying to engage with the mapper. In this case

Re: [talk-ph] "VJMEJ Planned" and "Open Paint Maps"

2022-04-16 Thread Jherome Miguel
I don't think that's the way to go from my experiences with Open Paint Maps. Be in contact in them in any way, they'll fire back. Yes, we should assume good faith in regard to contributions by new users, but for the case of VJMEJ Planned, they're suspicious. Changing fairly stable road