Re: [talk-ph] Follow-up on possible LGU-led mapping in Batangas

2020-01-23 Thread maning sambale
TagaSanPedroAko, > and asked GOwin and maning on GitHub to contact directly any of the LGUs > involved, but there has been no response since then. I'm not sure what else I can do here, you mentioned that you already contacted 3 users and there was no response. Secondly, these LGUs are likely

Re: [talk-ph] Follow-up on possible LGU-led mapping in Batangas

2020-01-23 Thread Nick Brown
Hi Jherome, HOT Ph is in touch with the Batangas PDRRMO via OCHA as well as OCD, but am not directly in touch with the municipalities. I'm unaware of any coordinated mapping efforts underway in affected areas, but HOT Ph can provide trainers to local LGUs upon request. We have a virtual mapathon

[talk-ph] Follow-up on possible LGU-led mapping in Batangas

2020-01-23 Thread Jherome Miguel
It has been a month ago since I raised quality issues on map data added on a possible local government-led mapping project in some municipalities in Batangas near Taal Volcano. Last December, we have seen a spike in mapping activity around the municipalities of Taal, Lemery, San Luis, San Nicolas,

Re: [talk-ph] Tagging of barangays and sitios/puroks

2020-01-23 Thread Ervin Malicdem
I am still for standardizing place=village and the use of place:PH=barangay for the purpose of synchronizing political designation to the global tag. This will prevent re-evaluating each of the barangays in the country that are already present in OSM and deciphering if it will be tagged as a