Re: [talk-ph] Follow-up on possible LGU-led mapping in Batangas

2020-01-30 Thread Jherome Miguel
I deleted most of the of suspicious POIs in question, on changesets where I also made major edits to improve building and road alignment with existing imagery, adding/remapping municipal and barangay boundaries to include barangays mapped as part of the Taal Volcano eruption response. I think

Re: [talk-ph] Follow-up on possible LGU-led mapping in Batangas

2020-01-23 Thread maning sambale
TagaSanPedroAko, > and asked GOwin and maning on GitHub to contact directly any of the LGUs > involved, but there has been no response since then. I'm not sure what else I can do here, you mentioned that you already contacted 3 users and there was no response. Secondly, these LGUs are likely

Re: [talk-ph] Follow-up on possible LGU-led mapping in Batangas

2020-01-23 Thread Nick Brown
Hi Jherome, HOT Ph is in touch with the Batangas PDRRMO via OCHA as well as OCD, but am not directly in touch with the municipalities. I'm unaware of any coordinated mapping efforts underway in affected areas, but HOT Ph can provide trainers to local LGUs upon request. We have a virtual mapathon

[talk-ph] Follow-up on possible LGU-led mapping in Batangas

2020-01-23 Thread Jherome Miguel
It has been a month ago since I raised quality issues on map data added on a possible local government-led mapping project in some municipalities in Batangas near Taal Volcano. Last December, we have seen a spike in mapping activity around the municipalities of Taal, Lemery, San Luis, San Nicolas,