Hi Tomas,
Am 30.05.2017 um 22:59 schrieb Tomas Marklund:
By the way, I think you have created a really cool service!
thank's
To avoid the problem with some /län/ and /kommun/ (=counties)
belonging to both /Svealand/ and /Sötaland/, you could just skip the
admin_level = 3 boundaries
By the way, I think you have created a really cool service!
To avoid the problem with some *län* and *kommun* (=counties) belonging to
both *Svealand* and *Sötaland*, you could just skip the admin_level = 3
boundaries completely, since they as Ture said really aren't administrative
boundaries
Bra jobbat!
/Johan
2017-05-30 21:32 GMT+02:00 Essin :
> Eftersom det inte kom några invändningar genomförde jag omtaggningarna.
>
> 5126 noder med uic_ref=74n men inte railway=* eller train=yes taggades
> om till gtfs_id=7400n.
> 153 noder och relationer med
Eftersom det inte kom några invändningar genomförde jag omtaggningarna.
5126 noder med uic_ref=74n men inte railway=* eller train=yes taggades
om till gtfs_id=7400n.
153 noder och relationer med nat_ref=7400n taggades om till
gtfs_id=7400n.
98 noder och relationer med
ok, strange but not wrong - thank's for this info.
My "boundaries map" https://wambachers-osm.website/boundaries is having
problems with this situation, so i'll have to find a workaround (without
changing anything in OSM). "Laxå kommun(7)" is missing - on my map, not
in OSM. :(
Regards
having problems with "umlaut" in links:
please use
https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/snaps_2017/rebro_ln.png
https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/snaps_2017/rebro2_ln.png
for bigger images.
sorry, walter aka wambacher
___
Talk-se
Hi,
there is a problem in sweden which i can't fix without your help.
see
Something is strange: the boundaries of Götaland(3) and Svealand(3) do
not match the AL4-boundaries in that area. Örebro län(4) is overlapping
Götaland(3) and there are two gaps southeast and southwest of Örebro län.