Re: [Talk-transit] [OSM-talk] Automated Populate/Update Problem

2023-01-28 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Welcome to osm! Regarding the "remove existing as final step": we generally expect people to conflate new data with existing data, so you should not remove the existing ones, but enrich them (including position acuracy if possible) with your data, and only create new objects for things that

Re: [Talk-transit] [Tagging] Feature Proposal -- RFC -- service=irregular

2019-07-13 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Mo., 1. Apr. 2019 um 11:55 Uhr schrieb Markus : > Hi everyone, > > I'm proposing the tag service=irregular for tram, light rail, > underground and other railway tracks not used for regular scheduled > passenger services, but only for diversions or shortcuts. > > >

Re: [Talk-transit] [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Public Transport v2 Vehicle Type "coach"

2017-10-06 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-10-05 0:09 GMT+02:00 Mikolai-Alexander Gütschow < mikolai.guetsc...@t-online.de>: > Now, I've looked again at the Oxomoa scheme proposal which already > suggested an idea to differentiate between different bus route types by > using the key "bus". Are there any arguments against this