Re: [Talk-transit] bus=yes opinion

2020-07-11 Thread Snusmumriken
On Sat, 2020-07-11 at 02:33 -0300, Agustin Rissoli wrote: > What are your opinion of adding bus=yes along with > public_transport=platform + highway=bus_stop? In the presence of highway=bus_stop I think the bus_yes tag is totally unnecessary. ___

Re: [Talk-transit] Ideas for a simplified public transportation scheme

2019-05-13 Thread Snusmumriken
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 08:47 -0400, Jarek PiĆ³rkowski wrote: > On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 03:50, Snusmumriken > wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 20:55 +0200, Tijmen Stam wrote: > > > It is not uncommon for key/values to be misnomers in OSM. > > > Clearest > > &g

Re: [Talk-transit] Ideas for a simplified public transportation scheme

2019-05-13 Thread Snusmumriken
On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 20:55 +0200, Tijmen Stam wrote: > a "public_transport=platform" is not defined as being "platform" > (raised good concrete flooring) but as "the place where people wait > to board a bus/tram/train". Whatever form that is. > > It is not uncommon for key/values to be misnomers

Re: [Talk-transit] Ideas for a simplified public transportation scheme

2019-05-07 Thread Snusmumriken
On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 13:53 -0500, Stephen Sprunk wrote: > On 2019-05-03 12:09, Dave F via Talk-transit wrote: > > On 30/04/2019 18:34, Stephen Sprunk wrote: > > > A platform is where people wait to board; if they stand at a > > > pole > > > (typical for buses), then the pole is logically the

Re: [Talk-transit] Ideas for a simplified public transportation scheme

2019-04-27 Thread Snusmumriken
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 17:10 +0200, Markus wrote: > Hi all, > > I've added, updated and corrected several dozen public transportation > routes in the past few years using the PTv2 scheme. As is the case > with most route relations, they often break (e.g., because the course > of a road or rails is