oh, in case stop_area relations are added, it makes sense to duplicate the
name of the stop on them.
Op do 26 jul. 2018 om 12:38 schreef Jo :
> Way 0:
>
> node next to highway/railway
> hw=bus_stop/rw=tram_stop
> pt=plaform
> bus=yes
> tram=yes
> name
> ref
> operator
> network
>
> IF there is a
Way 0:
node next to highway/railway
hw=bus_stop/rw=tram_stop
pt=plaform
bus=yes
tram=yes
name
ref
operator
network
IF there is a platform:
way or area with:
hw=platform and/or rw=platform
optionally pt=platform
optionally tactile_paving=
optionally wheelchair=
nothing else (details are on
Hi,
I would also be OK with only the stop in the relation (with all tags possible
(Way 1) or as Way 2 (see below)) and the other aspects just as additional
pieces, however, a bit of redundance could be there to make the platform and
relations also human-readable. I know, people dealing with
For me the fact that highway=bus_stop is only allowed on nodes is a plus,
not a minus.
The reason why I would like us all to use nodes for representing the stops
is that a route relation with a single node for each stop and then a
continuous linked string of ways is conceptually about as simple
