Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed changes to oxomoa schema [part 1]

2010-06-29 Thread Michał Borsuk
On 29 June 2010 07:29, Roland Olbricht roland.olbri...@gmx.de wrote: those two would meet in point A, from which the branch line sets off/rejoins the core line. So a hypothetical future route-finding algorithm would follow different_route to its end, upon meeting core line it would

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed changes to oxomoa schema [part 1]

2010-06-28 Thread Michał Borsuk
On 28 June 2010 20:35, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.comwrote: It's probably worth knowing what Potlatch2 will be capable of. Presumably it's relation-editing will be (is?) much improved, and the difficulties with implementing the Oxmoa standard will mostly go away. Oxomoa

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed changes to oxomoa schema [part 1]

2010-06-28 Thread Claudius Henrichs
Please find my comment on core lines below. Am 28.06.2010 19:54, Michał Borsuk: -- *ISSUE RAISED: * change to the way more complex lines are mapped, that is the introduction of tags or roles

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed changes to oxomoa schema [part 1]

2010-06-28 Thread Michał Borsuk
How would you enter this core line? It would be a relation with the ways and stops of the course again. So you would need the core line be a member of the branches and exception relations again. Example: Core line route=bus ref=100 additional_tag=[empty] branch line route=bus ref=100

Re: [Talk-transit] Proposed changes to oxomoa schema [part 1]

2010-06-28 Thread Roland Olbricht
those two would meet in point A, from which the branch line sets off/rejoins the core line. So a hypothetical future route-finding algorithm would follow different_route to its end, upon meeting core line it would continue along. It just doesn't work. Having an unordered relation or even