Re: [Talk-transit] Ideas for a simplified public transportation scheme

2019-05-08 Thread Tijmen Stam
On 06-05-19 19:29, Stephen Sprunk wrote: On 2019-04-30 06:06, Dave F via Talk-transit wrote: On 29/04/2019 16:22, Stephen Sprunk wrote: Stop areas are supposed to link stop positions to platforms, so a router knows which platform you need to take a route that only stops on a particular

Re: [Talk-transit] Ideas for a simplified public transportation scheme

2019-05-08 Thread Tijmen Stam
On 28-04-19 16:27, Jarek PiĆ³rkowski wrote: On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 10:04, Markus wrote: Tram stops often have platforms (and bus stops sometimes too). For such stops, two PTv1 elements are necessary because railway=tram_stop can't be used on the same area (or way) as railway=platform (they

Re: [Talk-transit] Ideas for a simplified public transportation scheme

2019-05-08 Thread Tijmen Stam
On 28-04-19 16:02, Markus wrote: On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 14:30, Snusmumriken wrote: Somehow I think that it is too late to define one schema that would rule the world. Too much has already been mapped for it to be redone. But I might be wrong. I also share your observation that PTv2 is way too

Re: [Talk-transit] Ideas for a simplified public transportation scheme

2019-05-08 Thread Ed Loach
I've been generally ignoring this thread, but did spot the handy summary from Jarek. In particular: > 7. For public transit routing, it appears that having highway_bus_stop > nodes ("locations where people wait for buses") arranged in order in > a > relation is sufficient, per the comments