I think that tag is not usable. There can be a train that goes from town to
town, making it an ordinary train line. Then when it comes to a big city, it
stops on every station, making it a commuter train line. How do you tag
that? I know there aren't a lot of these trains, but I think the tag
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that tag is not usable. There can be a train that goes from town to
town, making it an ordinary train line. Then when it comes to a big city, it
stops on every station, making it a commuter train line. How do you tag
Am 04.10.2011 14:34, schrieb Arun Ganesh:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com
mailto:jan...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that tag is not usable. There can be a train that goes
from town to town, making it an ordinary train line. Then when it
comes to a big
I did not propose to tag the *way* as commuter rail, but the *relations*
regarding these train connections. Commuter rail often uses the same rail
tracks as long distance services. That is why railway=rail is correct for
the ways; but IMHO route=commuter for the relations is interesting
On 10/04/2011 03:32 PM, Arun Ganesh wrote:
I did not propose to tag the *way* as commuter rail, but the
*relations* regarding these train connections. Commuter rail often
uses the same rail tracks as long distance services. That is why
railway=rail is correct for the ways; but
Am 04.10.11 21:40, schrieb Michael von Glasow:
You might want to add some characteristics that generally distinguish
such services from ordinary rail connections:
- Metropolitan area (city and surroundings)
- Schedules with frequent runs at mostly constant intervals (such as
every 20 minutes)
