Hi,
I'm a member in New Jersey and I've usually reserved any classifications for
roads that have any numerical designation assigned to them. In New Jersey, I
designate trunk roads sparingly, and hardly ever for roads maintained by the
county (with some exceptions for longer 500-series county hi
Hello all!
The OpenStreetMap Sacramento Mapping Party is this weekend at The
Temple Coffee House in central Sacramento. There will be lots of
hiking-mapping, urban-mapping and bike-mapping that can be done, but
if the weather doesn't agree with you, we can always spend the weekend
doing a
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Jason Straub wrote:
>
> Second, the color of the trunk highway concerns me a bit. Any other
> mapping company, online or not, uses the green line as a tollway. When I
> initially started, I was makring highways as trunks, only to see most of the
> region covered
I would be for this setup. I would mention a few things in passing. And I'm
sure these have been mentioned, but I would jus tlike to mention them.
First, I like the images on how much each highway it used. Trunk highways is
not a used term in the US, except for Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michi
Greetings,
I would also be happy to tag rural US 95 and US 93 as highway=primary.
How close are we to having a consensus?
--
-
Joseph Scanlan http://www.qsl.net/n7xsd
+1-702-455-3679
I'm talking more the Alaska highway, or US 50 through rural Nevada - not
driveways. Or the Transcanadian Highway ("Follow the only road. Follow the
only road" - South Park). Pick up any atlas; they'll show all sorts of minor
roads in desert areas. Of course, being a private drive or barely p
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
> But - what percentage of local traffic or through traffic ends up on those
> roads? It's relative importance that matter. If you need to go through an
> area - what do you take?
>
> Same concept applied to city labelling - look at a globe so
But - what percentage of local traffic or through traffic ends up on those
roads? It's relative importance that matter. If you need to go through an
area - what do you take?
Same concept applied to city labelling - look at a globe some time. It's not
unusual to see "Thule, Greenland" labelle
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Joseph Scanlan wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Alan Brown wrote:
>
> This is the way I like to think about it - if you're zoomed way out, a map
>> of motorways and trunk roads alone is best: plenty of useful
>> information, but not cluttered.
>>
>
> This philosophy
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Alan Brown wrote:
This is the way I like to think about it - if you're zoomed way out, a
map of motorways and trunk roads alone is best: plenty of useful
information, but not cluttered.
This philosophy helps justify what you'll find here in the desert south
west. For ex
OJ,
It's usually state or local governments that decide that.
In general you can cycle or hitch unless there are signs prohibiting it.
pete
-- Original message from "OJ W" : -- > Do motorways in OSM also imply that it is prohibited to non-motorised > traffic? (in t
11 matches
Mail list logo
