Hi US Mappers,
I'm toying with using Google's AppEngine to serve up map tiles. Could you
guys try browsing the following slippy map to do a load test for me?
http://opentiles.appspot.com/static/index.html?zoom=12lat=42.36782lon=-71.04361layers=B000
Thanks to Lars for the tiles -- they look
Hi All,
How about a spur of the moment mapping party in Toronto this Sunday? I
know! What a great idea! And the weather promises to be perfect
too.
The goal is to Clean up the aerial-mapped area in Bayview Village by
getting the rest of the street names, local POIs including parks,
schools
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Lars Ahlzen l...@ahlzen.com wrote:
I've been working on a topographic map based on OSM data, somewhat
similar in style to the National Geographic topo maps. It's very much
work in progress, but I thought someone here might be interested.
Feedback is welcome!
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Paul Fox p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us wrote:
is there a way to distinguish pavement type separately from
road classification? is there a standard tag for doing so?
surface=foo
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
in new england (and i assume in other
Chris Lawrence wrote:
Hey, Lars! The map looks really nice. One minor suggestion: you may
want to consider using the outline-style U.S. highway shield like most
commercial maps use instead of the black-background U.S. highway
shield, which works well for separate road signs to bring out the
Dale Puch wrote:
Beautiful!
A cosmetic suggestion is the airport runways seem too wide on pretty
much all but the highest zoom.
I agree. I'll make them thinner, and adjust the width properly for all
zoom levels.
One problem is that the current width may be somewhat accurate for large
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Paul Fox p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us wrote:
adam wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Paul Fox p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us
wrote:
... in my mind there's a big difference between unpaved and track.
Could you provide a photo of one of these roads?
i
ted wrote:
Paul Fox wrote:
does the standard renderer at o-s-m.org do rendering
based on the surface?
No, neither Mapnik nor Osmarender draw surface=unpaved differently. I
assume the same goes for the more detailed values (gravel, dirt, ...).
For example, part of East 600
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Lars Ahlzen l...@ahlzen.com wrote:
These areas are classified as FLATS (i.e. tidal flats) in
the MassGIS hydrography dataset
ah, well, they're clam flats with added sand for decor.
--
Bill
n1...@arrl.net bill.n1...@gmail.com
Wow, that looks great! I'm psyched to see someone people like you working
on US centric tileservers.
Zeke
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Lars Ahlzen l...@ahlzen.com wrote:
Hi OSMappers!
I've been working on a topographic map based on OSM data, somewhat
similar in style to the National
10 matches
Mail list logo
