User NE2 erroniously merged most of the US Interstate relations back into
single relations. About 12 hours of my work was destroyed. Please roll
back changeset 381206 if possible.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
Chris Hunter wrote:
User NE2 erroniously merged most of the US Interstate relations back
into single relations. About 12 hours of my work was destroyed. Please
roll back changeset 381206 if possible.
I erroneously did what you requested and found that I rolled back a 12
month old
Aargh - I fat-fingered it instead of copypasting - the are I worked last
night was fixed on this changeset:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3812016http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3812016
I just discovered the mass-update when I logged in about 20 minutes ago and
I've
According to the WIKI and some discussions back in April (
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2009-April/000976.html) and
again in September (
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2009-September/001597.html),
the US Interstate system was going to be moved into a new
On 2/7/10 1:58 PM, Chris Hunter wrote:
According to the WIKI and some discussions back in April
(http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2009-April/000976.html)
and again in September
(http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2009-September/001597.html),
the US Interstate
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 14:42 -0500, Richard Welty wrote:
i concur with the notion of splitting at state lines. i also think
that the longer US routes need
to be handled in a similar manner.
Yeah, that's sane. If for no other reason than the fact that the mile
markers reset at state lines. I
There is no 1000-member hard-cap on relationship. However, it becomes awkward
to edit huge relationships spanning many states since the likelihood for
conflicting changesets increases.
The Wiki does contain a modification based on the September discussion, but
it's very difficult to
I'm pretty new to OSM. I've been making pretty good progress at
cleaning up the generally broken TIGER data imports in and near
Bend, OR, where I live.
While in this process I've tried to do something consistent and
sensible with the highway and ref tags for the local parts of US
20 and US 97.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Chris Hunter chunter...@gmail.com wrote:
Last night, user NE2 cleaned up the interstate system by merging all of
the states with 2 relations per interstate back into 1 relation with
direction-based roles. I've already requested a roll-back on the area I was
Oh, and yes I did contact them via both the OSM Messaging system and the
WIKI's messaging system.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Chris Hunter chunter...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think NE2 is on any of these mailing lists. Can someone put a
temporary ban on their account? They've been
10 matches
Mail list logo
