On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:35:20 -0600, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
  tag k=ele v=278.9/
By the way, what is the datum for the elevation figure?
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:35:20 -0600, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
 Â
Alright then, I'm throwing my hat into the ring...
I accept the nomination to run for the temporary board of the U.S. Chapter
of OSM.
I have been active in the Washington OSM community since late 2008. I have
both helped organize and participate mapping parties in the Washington, DC
area,
Have seen it too in California. It's not only the elevation also lat/lon is
wrong for many summits.
If there is any better source correct it. I verify it by gps and topo 24k and
yahoo. If there is any official and better data I am all for replacing GNIS
data.
On 9 Feb 2010, at 19:35 , Mike
4 matches
Mail list logo