Re: [Talk-us] [Warning: Potential Flamewar] Clarifying Interstate Relations

2010-03-12 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:16:44 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote: Paul Johnson wrote: On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:58:38 -0500, Chris Hunter wrote: NE2 has been making a number of questionable edits in the northwest Oregon area recently; I wonder if it's possible to smack 'em upside the head with a

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-newbies] Fwd: Re: Re: Time to retire ref= on ways?

2010-03-12 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:36:36 -0500, Zeke Farwell wrote: Part of Paul's original email: * Many bridges and tunnels have signed references that would actually be physical attributes of a way, but with the ref= tag on ways describing the overlying route instead of the way itself, makes it

Re: [Talk-us] proposed first principles for United States road tagging

2010-03-12 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:31:19 +, Emilie Laffray wrote: One of the national road that I used regularly in France (N154) is very interesting as you go from what you would consider to just a secondary road to a primary road and back to a secondary road in some locations. The route is giving

Re: [Talk-us] proposed first principles for United States road tagging

2010-03-12 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:37:17 -0500, Anthony wrote: How so? I said motorway and/or trunk roads. Any roads which don't qualify as motorways would be trunks. But expressways are trunks. Can you provide an example of an expressway that isn't paved and isn't divided?

Re: [Talk-us] proposed first principles for United States road tagging

2010-03-12 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:39:15 -0500, Anthony wrote: If bicycles aren't prohibited, it's not a motorway. Then most of the US doesn't have motorways, by your definition; an idea I'm pretty sure most would find to be absurdist. ___ Talk-us mailing

[Talk-us] Terraserver Urban errors

2010-03-12 Thread Alan Mintz
Since sometime Thursday, Terraserver Urban imagery retrieved via WMS in JOSM is yielding random numbers of all-white tiles (the same thing it does for areas that are not covered by the urban imagery). I can't find any contact info on their website, as the project seems to be almost abandoned

Re: [Talk-us] Terraserver Urban errors

2010-03-12 Thread Nakor Osm
I have seen this too. Note that they moved there web site and using the new url http://msrmaps.com/ogcmap.ashx?version=1.1.1request=GetMapLayers=urbanareastyles=format=image/jpeg; is slightly better but still has issues. One annoying seen in JOSM is that it somehow caches the tiles. Deleting the

Re: [Talk-us] Terraserver Urban errors

2010-03-12 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Nakor Osm nakor@gmail.com wrote: I have seen this too. Note that they moved there web site and using the new url http://msrmaps.com/ogcmap.ashx?version=1.1.1request=GetMapLayers=urbanareastyles=format=image/jpeg; is slightly better but still has issues.

Re: [Talk-us] Terraserver Urban errors

2010-03-12 Thread Nakor
The image cache is in ~/.josm/plugins/wmsplugin/cache. What you can also do is adjust your zoom level slightly and JOSM will fetch fresh images. Thanks, I'll try that next time. N. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] proposed first principles for United States road tagging

2010-03-12 Thread Anthony
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:37:17 -0500, Anthony wrote: How so? I said motorway and/or trunk roads. Any roads which don't qualify as motorways would be trunks. But expressways are trunks. All of them? If you say so.

Re: [Talk-us] proposed first principles for United States road tagging

2010-03-12 Thread Anthony
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:37:17 -0500, Anthony wrote: How so? I said motorway and/or trunk roads. Any roads which don't qualify as motorways would be