On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 19:20 -0400, Chris Hunter wrote:
I have major philosophical issues
with the way the license change is
being handled, and feel that I can
no longer participate in the OSM
project.
I honestly haven't paid much attention to it. I figured it was pretty
messy, but legally
Chris, my goal in participating in OpenStreetMap was and still is to help
build a free and open map of the world. The license change does nothing to
alter that goal. I'm sorry you feel the way that you do. I encourage
everyone to continue to contribute to this great project.
Cheers,
Peter.
chris wrote:
Well, between the new links on the map and today's WIKI edit, it looks like
the Brits have decided to shove the ODbL down our throats after all. I have
major philosophical issues with the way the license change is being handled,
and feel that I can no longer participate in the
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Paul Fox p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us wrote:
chris wrote:
Well, between the new links on the map and today's WIKI edit, it looks
like
the Brits have decided to shove the ODbL down our throats after all. I
have
major philosophical issues with the way the
katie wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Paul Fox p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us wrote:
can someone lend a list-skimmer a clue? i see nothing but
cc-by-sa on the map and on the wiki.
The change noted here is that people creating new accounts need to agree to
dual license their
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Chris Hunter chunter...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, between the new links on the map and today's WIKI edit, it looks like
the Brits have decided to shove the ODbL down our throats after all. I have
major philosophical issues with the way the license change is
6 matches
Mail list logo
