Re: [Talk-us] United States Roadway Classification Guidelines

2010-07-28 Thread McGuire, Matthew
Tag for truth! Not to speak for Ian, but what I took that to mean was that tags should be based on observation, not based on how a feature should be represented on a map. Tagging incorrectly is not good. And tagging correctly is good. Tagging for the renderer is not correct. My own view is

Re: [Talk-us] United States Roadway Classification Guidelines

2010-07-28 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:01 AM, McGuire, Matthew matt.mcgu...@metc.state.mn.us wrote: What you mean is that it can transcend usefulness and become a sea of unclassified roads. Gotcha. Your usefulness my usefulness. Therefore, I'm advocating objectivity vs subjectivity. Can you show me

Re: [Talk-us] United States Roadway Classification Guidelines

2010-07-28 Thread Dale Puch
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:01 AM, McGuire, Matthew matt.mcgu...@metc.state.mn.us wrote: There's no observation that will tell you whether a road is primary or secondary. Agreed. There is no observation that will tell you whether a road is more important than another road that is not where