Re: [Talk-us] UVM-SAL Buildings

> From: Phil! Gold [mailto:phi...@pobox.com] > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] UVM-SAL Buildings > > * William Morris [2012-06-01 12:53 -0400]: > > is orthogonalization worthwhile in this case? > > I'm not sure it is. I tried using JOSM's orthogonalization tool on a > number of buildings and every time

Re: [Talk-us] UVM-SAL Buildings

* William Morris [2012-06-01 12:53 -0400]: > is orthogonalization worthwhile in this case? I'm not sure it is. I tried using JOSM's orthogonalization tool on a number of buildings and every time got a result that was worse than the original data in terms of being misaligned with the imagery. Mo

Re: [Talk-us] UVM-SAL Buildings

Fantastic. I'll give the plugin a run, along with some de-noding (is orthogonalization worthwhile in this case?), and check back with folks. And here's the pre-filtered buildings file county-wide (in .shp format still): http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23616645/Geosprocket_Share/mont_bld_large.zip Thanks!

Re: [Talk-us] UVM-SAL Buildings

* William Morris [2012-05-31 21:25 -0400]: > Trying this again, after a hiatus, here is a sample of a few hundred > buildings from a UVM-SAL land use classification. In this case it's > for an area just west of D.C. in Montgomery County, MD. I offer it for > your consideration before I pull the im