I have been working on the LA remap, which mostly involves
correcting thousands and thousands of edits by a user named blars.
The odd thing about the edits that blars did is that they
seem to have been done almost robotically. Although many
intersections have been changed enough to be marked
On 6/5/2012 3:42 PM, Mike N wrote:
On 6/5/2012 2:56 PM, stevea wrote:
But socially, or more properly stated, in the context of reaching OSM
consensus, what does our community think of (rather wholesale) reverts
of a contributor who has not agreed to the CT? Are we OK with that?
This nearly
Steve,
Thanks for your thoughts, and I hope others in the community
will share their views. My view would be that it should be OK to do
such a reverse if the person has not signed the new license,
particularly when there has been such an enormous number of questionable edits.
Given the earlier statements regarding alignment, etc, of the road
vectors, and the seemingly large amount of work to revert these
changes, perhaps an incremental replacement of road geometry with
TIGER 2011 data along with manual conflation of existing attributes
is a more effective
It seems we are speaking on many levels here.
NE2 talks of a redaction bot: powerful scripting so intelligent it
is not quite yet built (scripting coupled with lack of consensus
isn't power). Charlotte, a seriously dedicated user, wants to reduce
skull-aching editing, clearly seeing a
Perhaps some who know JOSM could take a look at the most recent
uploads by blars to see what the effect of reverting those changes would be.
At 07:36 PM 6/5/2012, you wrote:
It seems we are speaking on many levels here.
NE2 talks of a redaction bot: powerful scripting so intelligent it
Charlotte Wolter wrote:
Perhaps some who know JOSM could take a look at the most recent
uploads by blars to see what the effect of reverting those changes
would be.
At 07:36 PM 6/5/2012, you wrote:
It seems we are speaking on many levels here.
NE2 talks of a redaction bot: powerful
7 matches
Mail list logo
