Concerning ref tags on ways, I don't think there's a need to impose
nationwide consistency. I also don't think it's worth even adhering to a
strict machine-parseable syntax (particularly dealing with overlaps) since
that kind of information is much better organized in relations.
That said, here
On 9/12/2012 11:19 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
what i recall is that NE2 likes the appearance of bare route numbers and
most of his ref
tags have no prefix at all (see FL, PA, NJ among other states where he
did a lot of this.)
I've seen a number of people who put the bare number in the ref tag
if I remember correctly, the US Local Chapter was planning to render
highway shields, now that combined shield and overlap rendering is
solved.
What happened to that? Is there a blocker? If so, what is / are the
blocker(s)?
There appears to be periodic community interest in highway shields.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
if I remember correctly, the US Local Chapter was planning to render
highway shields, now that combined shield and overlap rendering is
solved.
What happened to that? Is there a blocker? If so, what is / are the
Hi,
On 09/13/2012 03:12 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
Sounds like just such a planet is available,
... in a couple hours!
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-us mailing list
David,
I agree with much of what you said.
However, I'm not sure why the size of a
state should make a difference in what
abbreviation is used. Large or small, shouldn't
the state abbreviation be consistent?
Also, in the B section, where you
suggest US 1 plus US 9
can't wait!
Unfortunately, I don't have enough disk space to import a ODbL planet
while keeping the CC planet up. I need an up-to-date ways table to run
the Fairy Dust against for the Remap-a-tron. Or more to the point: I
need a current osmosis snapshot schema ways table (with ways geometry)
and
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:57 AM, David ``Smith'' vidthe...@gmail.com wrote:
Concerning ref tags on ways, I don't think there's a need to impose
nationwide consistency. I also don't think it's worth even adhering to a
strict machine-parseable syntax (particularly dealing with overlaps) since
On 9/13/2012 1:15 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
Most of the ones in Kansas are actually KS XX - might have something
to do with me having done most of them and I consider national
consistency to be of value
I would agree with national consistency. There will always be
contention - in SC, the DOT
On Sep 13, 2012 11:51 AM, Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.com wrote:
David,
I agree with much of what you said.
However, I'm not sure why the size of a state should make a
difference in what abbreviation is used. Large or small, shouldn't the
state abbreviation be
I've gone and updated the imagery bounds and bboxes for both Potlatch 2 and
JOSM for the North American imagery sources. JOSM should now only suggest a
source if it actually covers the area.
Potlatch 2 will still suggest sources even if they don't cover the area
because potlatch 2 only supports
11 matches
Mail list logo
