On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Dion Dock wrote:
> Any thoughts? It was there last year,
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=11/45.3628/-121.7972.
>
It's still there:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1275975
I think something in the rendering machine's osm2pgsql got screwed up,
because
Any thoughts? It was there last year,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=11/45.3628/-121.7972.
BTW, how does one find an area that was deleted?
thanks,
-Dion
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/
There is a discussion on Slash dot about OSM. The commentary is
interesting, from a community building perspective, considering the
technical nature of the /. community.
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/14/01/14/2335240/why-the-world-needs-openstreetmap
Michael Patrick
__
Just did a visual on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10386713 and it is
indeed S Valley Highway
From: "russdeff...@gmail.com"
To: Frederik Ramm
Cc: "talk-us@openstreetmap.org Openstreetmap"
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us]
name:lang tags are for the name in lang, not for the name translated to
lang. My neighborhood name could be translated into many languages, but that
doesnt mean it has anything other than an English name.
Its also important to remember that English is not a default in OSM names
From: Pete
Will discuss at our winter editathon, thanks for making me aware - something
this CO native (not to Denver though) did not know.
> On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have recevied a message about a potential problem with the naming
> of I-25 in the Denver, CO a
Simon,
I tried Kort here in Portland, Oregon. It gave me some interesting things
to think about. I'd hoped to send them to talk-ch, but it seems I can't
without subscribing in the longer term. Maybe you can relay this to your
local colleagues?
Kort gave me three types of mission. One was to ente
Hi,
I have recevied a message about a potential problem with the naming
of I-25 in the Denver, CO area. The message goes:
> Someone got super confused when doing the map in Colorado/Denver
> Area. We do not have an interstate called the South Valley Hwy. They
> confused a different super tiny
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 03:47:37PM -0800, stevea wrote:
> >Thanks for the great info. I'll definitely check out the Speed_limit
> >page for tips.
> >
> >Also, I know that the data is largely good, partly because it _is_ the
> >Traffic Code and therefore is the legal origin of the speed limits of
>
On 1/16/2014 12:16 AM, James Mast wrote:
Anyways guys, post what you think should be done here so I can get back
to the DWG on this subject. (I'm personally all for the reverting of
the highway=xxx upgrades this user has done only and not a full scale
revert of all his changesets as he did do so
10 matches
Mail list logo