Re: [Talk-us] Geopolitical divisions in Ohio

Somehow I sent this to talk-us instead of imports-us. Sorry about that. -- m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Geopolitical divisions in Ohio

Somehow I posted this to talk-us instead of imports-us. Sorry about that. -- m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Geopolitical divisions in Ohio

Hi David, On 21:54 2014-03-15, David Days wrote: Minh, I appreciate your response--a little more detail on my end might help answer some of your questions and clarify my goals. I live near Portsmouth, OH (heh...in those "hilly areas" of which you speak), and I'm working on an electoral supp

Re: [Talk-us] OpenStreetMap Isn't All That Open, Let's Change That and Drop Share-Alike

I am still thinking about this and look forward to Alex's talk next month in DC. However, as a "business user" who directed a lot of money toward OSM at one point in my career, I thought it would be useful to run through why the SA aspects of the license were important to me at the time. I was at

Re: [Talk-us] OpenStreetMap Isn't All That Open, Let's Change That and Drop Share-Alike

* Alex Barth [2014-03-13 10:26 -0400]: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/21221 This is really similar to the discussions that periodically happen in the open source software community over whether share-alike licenses like the GPL or open-use licenses like the 3-clause BSD license

Re: [Talk-us] State ref tags on ways: Use of unique ISO/ANSI/USPS 2-letter state codes in RELATIONS as well as WAYS?

* Toby Murray [2014-03-12 00:33 -0500]: > I went and verified some things about bannered routes. It looks like the > current shield rendering looks for network=X:Y:Modifier. So for example the > US 50 truck route in Cincinnati is network=US:US:Truck and ref=50. [snip] > Looking around it looks lik