Also sounds like M-3, M-10, etc should probably be tagged MI 3, MI 10...
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:11 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Just thought I'd give you guys a heads up, but there is a user going
around and adding '-' to all the ref tags he modifies in Michigan.
A
This has probably come up in the past, but Michigan's state highways are
signed and referred to as M ##
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Michigan_Highways
It's also mentioned on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan/Highway_Relations, which
differentiates between the network
That is odd. Perhaps their thinking was that the ref information
should be captured in a relation and that they wanted to forcefully
deprecate the ref tag on the way? I checked for the I-75 example and a
relation with route info is in place for it:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/335614
On 9/26/2014 9:57 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
This is not really appropriate since the main map rendering stylesheet
still takes ref tags from ways to paint the route number shields.
There is work underway to take that information from route relations
Yeah, the consensus on the lists was to always use the postal abbreviation
for the state. Kansas and Colorado also tend to refer on the signs to C
149 or K 66 but are generally tagged CO 149 or KS 66...
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com
wrote:
This has
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
I did do a screenshot, showing rendering in the Seattle area based on
route relations: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-
carto/issues/596#issuecomment-57001666
This seems broken, especially places where
On Sep 26, 2014, at 12:28 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
This seems broken, especially places where multiple highway networks have
ambiguous numbers in the same area (like I 110 and CA 110, which intersect,
US 412 and OK 412P, which intersect, or US 64 and OK 364, which intersect
(and I'm
On 2014-09-26 12:28, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Paul Norman
penor...@mac.com
mailto:penor...@mac.com wrote:
I did do a screenshot, showing rendering in the Seattle area based
on route relations:
On 2014-09-26 12:22, Paul Johnson wrote:
Yeah, the consensus on the lists was to always use the postal
abbreviation for the state. Kansas and Colorado also tend to refer on
the signs to C 149 or K 66 but are generally tagged CO 149 or KS 66...
As I've noted in the past, the consensus among
9 matches
Mail list logo
