I’m considering whether it makes sense to remove the `tiger:reviewed=no` tag
when a user performs certain edits in iD.
Discuss here: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2697
On Jun 22, 2015, at 2:46 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
In other words, it won't route over a
In other words, it won't route over a rural road tagged as
highway=residential
tiger:reviewed=no
Most of the well reviewed Tiger I see still has this tag.
People don't know to delete it. The automatic delete on edit does not
apply to tiger:reviewed (it applies to a Tiger tag
So, just for fun, I'm going through the area you pointed out and fixing some of
the roads. I'm making some of those Unclassified instead of Tertiary because
they go from nowhere to nowhere, but feel free to change them.
I plan on making a road trip in a few weeks, and depending on timing and
Usually I change it to =yes instead of just deleting it. The main reason is I
frequently use ITOworld maps to review the county I live in to find unreviewed
roads, and I like the color pattern better that way.
-jack
On June 22, 2015 2:46:36 AM EDT, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
4 matches
Mail list logo
