Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

Alan McConchie writes: > Thanks everyone for your strong but sincere criticism so far. In the > thread here on talk-us, I explained _what_ we were trying to do, but I > didn't explain very much about our rationale: _why_ we think this is > an important idea. The wiki

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

On 2016.03.26. 01:10, Alan McConchie wrote: ... Thanks everyone for your strong but sincere criticism so far. In the thread here on talk-us, I explained _what_ we were trying to do, but I didn't explain very much about our rationale: _why_ we think this is an important idea. The wiki proposal

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Greg Troxel wrote: > > There seems to be some wiki-agitation going on about a "proposed tag" of > social path. Perhaps everyone who is opposed might want to look and > register opposition, unless they are more opposed to wikifiddling than > to

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

Hi Greg and others, Following the official procedure for proposing a new tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process ) I created that wiki page a few days ago, and now I've sent an email to the tagging list, to officially

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

Hi, On 03/25/2016 11:36 PM, Greg Troxel wrote: > There seems to be some wiki-agitation going on about a "proposed tag" of > social path. Perhaps everyone who is opposed might want to look and > register opposition, unless they are more opposed to wikifiddling than > to this tag :-) I wouldn't

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

Is it just me, or does social_path sound like the way to a "social disease"? -jack On March 25, 2016 6:36:56 PM EDT, Greg Troxel wrote: > >There seems to be some wiki-agitation going on about a "proposed tag" >of >social path. Perhaps everyone who is opposed might want to

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

There seems to be some wiki-agitation going on about a "proposed tag" of social path. Perhaps everyone who is opposed might want to look and register opposition, unless they are more opposed to wikifiddling than to this tag :-) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Social_path

Re: [Talk-us] Caliparks re-tagging paths?

Mike Thompson writes: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:26 AM, Marc Gemis wrote: > >> They tagged them as "social_path", according to their blog entry [1] >> > Totally unacceptable. OpenStreetMap maps what is observable on the ground > (generally). If