Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

2017-11-21 Thread Andy Townsend
On 20/11/2017 23:30, Ian Dees wrote: Please remember to stay on topic and friendly. This thread seems to be drifting off into a discussion about the merits of OSM editors. Well, my comment about editors wasn't supposed to be offtopic, since the question of data being "... far easier to

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

2017-11-21 Thread OSM Volunteer stevea
On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:27 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Okay, I will withhold myself from touching polygons in the Santa Cruz County > for next couple of years, and let's see how your future experience with > SCCGIS goes on. We can get back to this question later in scope of

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

2017-11-21 Thread Joel Holdsworth
On 21/11/17 14:29, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Steve, On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 04:34:18PM -0800, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: O> If the reltoolbox plug-in as as powerful as I am beginning to understand it may be (I appreciate the introduction, Gleb), and given my agreement that certain use cases

Re: [Talk-us] Multipolygonizing

2017-11-21 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Steve, On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 04:34:18PM -0800, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: O> If the reltoolbox plug-in as as powerful as I am beginning to understand it may be (I appreciate the introduction, Gleb), and given my agreement that certain use cases (especially landuse) benefit greatly from