On 20/11/2017 23:30, Ian Dees wrote:
Please remember to stay on topic and friendly. This thread seems to be
drifting off into a discussion about the merits of OSM editors.
Well, my comment about editors wasn't supposed to be offtopic, since the
question of data being "... far easier to
On Nov 21, 2017, at 1:27 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Okay, I will withhold myself from touching polygons in the Santa Cruz County
> for next couple of years, and let's see how your future experience with
> SCCGIS goes on. We can get back to this question later in scope of
On 21/11/17 14:29, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Steve,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 04:34:18PM -0800, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote:
O> If the reltoolbox plug-in as as powerful as I am beginning to understand it
may be (I appreciate the introduction, Gleb), and given my agreement that certain
use cases
Steve,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 04:34:18PM -0800, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote:
O> If the reltoolbox plug-in as as powerful as I am beginning to understand it
may be (I appreciate the introduction, Gleb), and given my agreement that
certain use cases (especially landuse) benefit greatly from
4 matches
Mail list logo