Re: [Talk-us] Parks, again

On Sat, 6 Jan 2018 21:11:04 + Doug Hembry wrote: > IMHO, AT THE VERY LEAST, the background green fill for leisure=park > could and should be dropped by openstreeetmap-carto - it is > unnecessary, causes problems, and can be replaced by natural=* or > landcover=* .

[Talk-us] weeklyOSM #389 2017-12-26-2018-01-01

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 389, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/9835/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[Talk-us] Parks, again

Greetings everyone.. I have a stake in this discussion, being resident in CA and dealing regularly with the representation of the various state and local parks, Open Spaces, Ecological Reserves, water company lands, National Parks and Forests, etc, etc, with which this state is blessed. It's a